· Opening to listening , networking and co-production practices with neighboring territories . The presence of a heritage institution , starting from the managed space , can and perhaps must become a leaven for the activation of cultural production practices of the territory . Preserving the contemporaneity and topicality of the heritage , educating the visitor to recognize its disruptive power , is the ( unexpected ) task of protection , as well as a continuous possibility of critical and informative enrichment . Part of this productive responsibility lies in the dialogue with local contexts regarding the definition and explanation of choices . It is not a question of sharing responsibility , but of assuming specific cultural responsibilities within the framework of an intense dialogue , which also allows for situations of confrontation , conflict and dissonance . The cultural institution thus assumes the political and technical task of forming a public cultural sphere .
· Environmental sustainability of processes , practices and technologies . These processes must be integrated and sustainable . This means that the disciplines of environmental and technological sustainability must be an aware part of the redesign of the activities starting from the materials used in cleaning , catering services , materials and technologies available , but also incorporated into the principles of ecological design provided for recovery open spaces . The reduction of the environmental fingerprint of cultural institutions must be part of the process of reallocating resources to the advantage of the more sophisticated processes of attention to presence .
The physical and infrastructural characteristics of the island have suggested to strongly delimit the technological intensity and the overall purpose of the intervention , both for the renewal and refurbishment components and the museum interventions .
126