The Geographer Spring 2014 | Page 22

Independence: International Angles Norway at the dawn of sovereign statehood Professor Øyvind Østerud, Department of Political Science, University of Oslo “The union with Sweden, which lasted until 1905, was quite loose.” Norway became a sovereign state in 1814, after more than 400 years as a province governed by Denmark. In the Kiel treaty of January 1814, after Napoleon’s defeat at Leipzig, sovereignty over Norway was transferred from the Danish to the Swedish king. The Danish king had been allied to Napoleon, while Sweden supported the victorious powers. There were no state institutions on Norwegian soil during Danish reign. How could Norway emerge from the Napoleonic wars with sovereign statehood? The diplomatic and war flag of the Swedish-Norwegian Union. A postcard from the time of the Norwegian referendum 1905. Published by John Grieg, in Bergen. First, Norwegian statehood from 1814 had two distinct sources. It was a gift from the great powers who forced Denmark to surrender Norway, as punishment for Denmark’s support of Napoleon. Then there was a political selfawareness among the Norwegian elites and parts of the broader public, together with the ambitions of the Danish viceroy in Norway, who volunteered to be crowned as head of the new Norwegian state. The viceroy was prince of Denmark. He gave direction to Norwegian patriotism, even if his long-term vision might have been a reunification with Denmark. He was forced by Sweden to resign from the Norwegian crown (but he made his come-back as king of Denmark in 1839). Second, the Swedish royal authorities accepted the Norwegian constitution of 17th May with few modifications. The decision-making competence of the Norwegian Parliament, the Storting, was preserved within a personal union headed by the joint king, even if Sweden was the major royal power base. Sweden did not enforce supremacy in Norway in the immediate aftermath of the Kiel treaty, since their military forces were preoccupied with the allied march against France. When they turned to Norway in the summer of 1814, after the rebellion of the constitutional assembly, the newly elected king capitulated quickly and promised to leave the country. Sweden, on the other hand, compromised and accepted the strong position of the Storting. The union with Sweden, which lasted until 1905, was quite loose. Under this union, foreign policy was a royal prerogative, but otherwise Norwegian institutions reigned supreme. In legal affairs, the royal veto could postpone decisions made by the Storting, but not block them with finite force. The two countries had quite separate economies with a different economic base. The populations had not been extensively mixed and they retained, or even cultivated, their separate cultural identities. Even without state institutions, Norway as a separate political entity had a flying start with the university in Christiania (now Oslo) from 1811. Many notables in the new state saw the national university as a cornerstone of emerging administrative institutions. The major Norwegian elites had their background as prominent figures in the dual kingdom of DenmarkNorway. Many of them had nurtured Norwegian patriotism as students in Copenhagen during the last decades of the 18th century. This experience, as public figures and officials, made it easier to construct state institutions in Norway. Major ministries were organized already in the autumn of 1814. The Supreme Court was established the year after. The militar B