Stoking Curiosity 2018 Report 3825 StokingCuriosity.EvaluationReport.0419.joomag | Page 9

FEEDBACK We received less feedback from visitors than we would have liked. This was because of where we had placed the evaluation activities. • 15% of visitors gave feedback on the day or in an online survey afterwards. • 33 visitors gave us details of their age, gender, ethnic origin, education and disability. • But the profiles of people who visited seemed similar to those who usually go to public festivals organised by Universities. • 50% of presenters gave feedback (almost equal numbers of academics and community presenters). Feedback from presenters and volunteers is included because they visited other people’s activities. • 10 people were interviewed on film. Watch the video here: vimeo.com/312483634/2e48fbdc5f FEEDBACK FROM STOKING CURIOSITY PLANNING GROUP MEMBERS The festival was genuinely co-produced, the planning group members who gave feedback rated this 8/10. ‘Very positive and trusting collaborative preparation, where team members were clear about their own agreed responsibilities in preparation for and throughout the event’. FEEDBACK FROM VISITORS, PRESENTERS AND VOLUNTEERS The festival: • Encouraged further learning • Stimulated them to connect and do things together • Gave them rewards for taking part • Showed the cultural potential of the Spode site and the city of Stoke-on-Trent. The most common words in visitors’ feedback suggests that Stoking Curiosity was unique and offered something unexpected that people liked. Both the Spode site and the activities ‘stoked’ people’s curiosity. People particularly mentioned: • the use of plastics • the chemistry of glass art • the clay counter currency project • Arts on Prescription discussion • the periodic table (Pottery about Chemistry) • the Stoking Curiosity piano creative art project. SPARKING IDEAS AND NEW CONNECTIONS ‘The one thing that is becoming really clear to me is that there are a lot of people in the local area with similar goals and motivation. I feel that by being better able to connect with them, we can better serve the community’. FEEDBACK FROM PRESENTERS FROM UNIVERSITIES, COMMUNITY ORGANISATIONS AND BUSINESSES Conversations at the festival had given them possible new ideas and partnerships to develop their existing work or new work. Presenters from the Universities also said that the experience had made them think that: • academic research can be improved by using the arts and creativity offered by local communities • they would like to use more creative visual methods, as well generally using more varied communication methods for their activities in the future. 9