In the above example, we see that the net gain to PC |
Increased domestic production would result in additional |
manufacturer( or reduction in revenue cost to the government) |
domestic value added, which in turn would yield additional |
due to introduction of a differential duty regime for PCs is |
income and consumption tax revenues to the governments. |
reduced marginally from 10.5 % to 10.2 % due to the |
These so called multiplier effects( i. e., additional value added |
simultaneous introduction of a differential duty regime for |
in the economy) would vary in the short term and long term. |
some key components. Such reduction in revenue cost for the |
In the short term, there would be substitution of domestically |
government will also be accompanied with greater value |
assembled / manufactured finished products for imports, with |
addition and job creation within the country. In due course of |
no increase in the domestic production of components and |
time, as economies of scale are built up, the differential duty |
parts. The quantum of additional value added from such |
regime could be extended to more components, encouraging |
substitution would be modest, as assembling of imported |
further value addition and job creation within India. |
products generates domestic value addition of only 5.5 % of |
Positive revenue impact of multiplier effects |
total output value of finished products. The value addition( and |
The degree of substitution of domestic products for imports |
the resulting multiplier effects) would be much larger if the |
could vary depending on the nature of competition between |
policy measures also result in increased domestic production of |
the two. It would be unrealistic to assume that domestic |
components and parts. |
manufacturers would be able to capture 100 % of the domestic |
The short-term improvement in value addition is estimated to |
market. For illustrative purposes, we have shown revenue cost |
be modest, even assuming that imports of finished products |
assuming there is 100 % reduction in imports. |
are reduced to zero. The longer term improvement in value |
A limited survey of major producers in the country suggests |
addition would be much larger. |
that they do have substantial unutilized capacity, and would be |
The table below provides some possible scenarios in terms of |
able to ramp up production very quickly to at least double their |
additional employment, income and tax revenue generation. |
share in the domestic market. |
DEMAND |
|||||||
Total demand( est.) |
Mln nos. |
10.60 |
11.21 |
12.33 |
14.80 |
17.76 |
21.31 |
Employment multiplier for |
No. |
2 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
4 |
component mfg. |
|||||||
Total employment( est.) |
Nos. |
4,935 |
5,292 |
16,227 |
38,944 |
46,733 |
56,079 |