taken literally. Here comes the question how to interpret them, as in this way everyone can
interpret them subjectively. To avoid arbitrariness in interpretation that would lead to
disagreements and controversies most Christian churches have limited interpretation only
within the context of the given text. But here comes another question, is it possible that
word inspired of God has only a narrow meaning as per the context, does it not contain
messages in a much broader sense referring to all mankind? Once prophetess Vanga has
told that God's Word has an internal sense and only people with more developed
consciousness can get to the deeper layers of its meaning. In my opinion the more correct
way to interpret it is to seek a rational meaning, comparing it with the most perfect option
that we could imagine.
Let's look at the basic Christian beliefs and doctrines
preached by most churches, and to think how rational and
perfect they look . First, Church accepts that the only book
completely inspired of God ( such one that can not contain
errors) is the Bible which automatically means that the
apostles and characters from the Old Testament were
perfect because only the perfect soul, that has completed
its evolution, knows and confesses truth without errors . In
this case I exclude Christ because he was actually beyond
our evolution. Is it not naive to think that the infinite God
has revealed himself only in a "perfect " Bible and rely only on the churches to save
humanity preaching the Bible? Is it reasonable to believe that the founders of the official
churches didn’t remove texts from the holy scriptures, and perhaps added such,in their
numerous attempts to manipulate others. But the Bible says: "check and examine
everything." One uses only this word that one can understand with one’s mind and try with
one’s heart.
6