Saint Olave's Law Society Journal ; Issue 01 (Autumn 2013) | Page 19
Saint
Olave’s
Law
Society
Journal
was
based
on
a
photograph
taken
by
the
AP
freelancer
Mannie
Garcia.
They
demanded
compensation
for
the
use
of
the
photograph
but
Fairey
used
the
defence
of
fair
use
and
claimed
that
his
poster
did
not
reduce
the
value
of
the
original
photograph.
Both
parties
came
to
a
private
settlement
in
January
2011,
which
included
a
split
in
profits.
Victor
Whitmill
v.
Warner
Bros.
Entertainment
Inc.
In
the
movie
The
Hangover
Part
II,
the
character
Stu
Price
wakes
up
with
a
tattoo,
which
is
identical
to
the
one
that
Mike
Tyson
has
on
the
left
side
of
his
face.
Tyson’s
tattoo
artist
S.
Victor
Whitmill
filed
a
lawsuit
against
Warner
Bros.
Entertainment
as
he
had
attained
a
copyright
for
the
eight-?year-?old
“artwork
on
3-?D”.
He
claimed
that
the
use
of
his
design
in
the
movie
and
in
advertisements
without
his
consent
was
copyright
infringement.
Warner
Bros.
however
saw
it
as
falling
under
“fair
use.”
The
judge
on
the
case
denied
an
injunction
on
the
movie’s
release,
but
that
Whitmill
still
had
a
case.
In
order
to
avoid
a
longer
trial,
Warner
Bros.
said
that
it
would
be
willing
to
digitally
alter
the
film
to
show
a
different
tattoo
on
Ed
Helms’s
face
when
the
movie
was
released
on
home
video.
However
Warner
Bros.
and
Whitmill
eventually
came
to
an
agreement
of
undisclosed
terms.
Isaac
Newton
v.
Gottfried
Wilhelm
Leibniz
In
the
early
18th
century,
many
credited
Gottfried
Wilhelm
Leibniz
with
inventing
the
study
of
calculus;
Leibniz
had
been
the
first
to
publish
papers
on
the
topic.
But
Isaac
Newton
published
a
book
called
Opticks
in
1704,
in
which
he
asserted
himself
as
the
father
of
calculus
and
a
debate
arose.
Newton
claimed
that
he
wrote
about
the
branch
of
mathematics
in
1665
and
1666,
but
only
shared
his
work
with
a
few
colleagues
and
accused
Leibniz
of
plagiarizing
one
of
these
early
drafts.
Leibniz
died
in
1716
before
anything
could
be
settled
between
the
two.
Today,
however,
historians
agree
that
Newton
and
Leibniz
were
co-?inventors,
and
came
to
the
idea
independently
of
each
other.
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
is
copying
without
giving
credit
to
author
of
the
original
work.
Plagiarism
does
not
actually
exist
in
a
legal
sense
and
is
an
ethical
offence
rather
than
a
criminal
offence.
Nevertheless
if
it
infringes
the
copyright
on
another
work,
it
is
a
crime.
Giving
credit
is
not
a
legal
requirement
in
the
Copyright
Act
and
therefore
not
all
plagiarism
is
copyright
infringement.
Likewise,
it
is
possible
to
infringe
copyright
without
plagiarising.
In
areas
such
as
journalism,
academia
and
the
arts,
plagiarism
is
considered
a
great
moral
offence
and
a
breach
of
ethics.
Famous
plagiarism
cases;
Beyoncé
There
have
been
several
occasions
when
Beyoncé
has
admitted
copying
other
artists
after
speculations
of
plagiarism.
Her
Billboard
2011
Performance
was
widely
praised
for
its
creativity
but
has
actually
been
accused
of
plagiarising
a
performance
by
an
Italian
musician
called
Lorella
Cuccarini
in
2010
as
the
performances
contain
many
similarities.
She
was
also
criticised
for
copying
dances
choreographed
by
the
Belgian
choreographer
Anne
Teresa
De
Keersmaeker’s
in
her
music
video
for
her
2011
single
‘Countdown’
as
well
as
Bob
Fosse’s
1969
dance
routine
‘Mexican
Breakfast’
in
her
2008
music
video
for
Single
Ladies.
Issue
01
Autumn
2013
* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??* ??*???* ???