NORDHAVNEN'S LIVING LAB Jun. 2013 | Page 31

? A!!! B C

Inspirational questions
Question CQ-1: What can be concluded on the overall environmental impact of car sharing? Question CQ-2: What effects over society can be observed? Question CQ-3: Does sustainability-aligned car sharing hold the potential to be a profitable business model? In which ways?
Question CQ-4: Can car sharing contribute for lowering conventional parking ratio? What is the relationship between the amount of required parking spaces to be built and the amount of car sharing memberships?
Question CQ-5: What can be learned from feedback loops, stemming from users? Question CQ-5-1: What do user surveys tell us about levels of satisfaction and dissatisfaction? Question CQ-5-2: Which user needs remain unanswered? Is further accommodation of these needs necessary or desirable? Question CQ-5-3: What are user’ s main concerns? Do any of these require extra attention?
Question CQ-6: What patterns of usage emerge among the different customers? Question CQ-6-1: Do we observe increasing or decreasing dependence on shared cars among the users? Question CQ-6-2: Which user groups are over- and underrepresented? Why? Question CQ-7: How have different actor’ s perceptions towards car sharing evolved? Question CQ-8: Which of the offered features( see also part B) are financially sound? Which areas require further nurturing? Question CQ-9: What is the interplay between car sharing experiments and legal regulations? Question CQ-9-1: Do any regulations hamper or ease the development of desired features, that car sharing brings? Question CQ-9-2: Should any regulation be adjusted to counteract undesired features of car sharing? Question CQ-9-3: What role can the planning act play in order to align the framework conditions to the desired role of car sharing in the mobility system?

16