Military Review English Edition November-December 2013 | Page 49

TEAMS OF LEADERS High Performing Leader Teams (Top View) Teams of Leaders (ToL) Information Management Knowledge Knowledge Management Management Figure 1 Teams of Leaders (top view) power” required for successful stability and civil support operations.8 Vastly broader JIIM applications such as support to civilian law enforcement seem certain to follow. Building the “Seat of the ToL Stool” All of the essential goodness evident in sharing data and information developing knowledge and eventually actionable understanding to solve problems should make collaboration the evident cure-all for improved decision making. It isn’t. Sharing often is resisted, particularly across walls of stovepipes in bureaucratic organizations governed by those competing for power, position, and resources—no win-win collaboration, rather zero-sum contests of will.9 Win-win can come only after senior leader intervention to encourage informal collaboration across borders accompanied by institutionalization of ToL organizational practices. Sharing supporting ToL requires some measure of skills, knowledge, and attitudes to be possessed and shared by all of the members of any leader team if the leader team is to be effective. Building this sharing isn’t rocket science. First, we need to work MILITARY REVIEW • November-December 2013 together to develop shared purpose within the team. What exactly are we becoming a team to do? As you define the problem together, shared competence develops. You begin to think through the problem being addressed together by understanding each other’s competencies. With that, trust develops. To the degree that these shared SKA of purpose, trust, and competence expand, leader team performance improves. As improvement occurs, shared confidence develops. When SKA are fully shared among all members of the team, particularly across borders, escalating high performance occurs that sells itself. A high performing leader team—the leadership leg of ToL—has been generated, often stimulated through short rapid-thinking LTX. ( Success breeds “champions” who, co-opted, then spread “their” ToL practices across borders. Seem simple? It is, just as a comparable AAR thinking process has been applied to generating “hard power.” The rate of further ToL proliferation is influenced by the over-arching collaboration environment that is present in the organizational stovepipe of the “champion.” This is the seat of the stool, embedding ToL practices in the routine of organizations. 47