Military Review English Edition November-December 2013 | Page 48

significantly higher performing staff, increased horizontal
and vertical communications,

The performance potential of ToL—
and shared priorities and
IM x KM x high performing leader team
focus of effort. This—ToL—
is no silver bullet—not fairy
building—is equal and perhaps greater
dust—but rather the application of enlightened, thoughtthan the improved performance achieved
ful, effective procedures
routinely by the OC x OPFOR x AAR x IS
by talented professionals—
commencing with a series of
paradigm of the highly successful Army
‘ah-ha’s’ that quickly become
Training System.
self-generating. While buffeted by the growth of the
command, thanks to ToL,
based on the ToL precedent,
I am increasingly enthusiastic about what this program
what they have learned. Included below are two offers to the U.S. whole of government and multiviews of the conceptual framework—top and side. national organizations.”
The side view is perhaps more expressive of ToL
Personally responsible for several parallel
because presentation as a stool accentuates that development paths of both the Army Training
there is more to ToL than a Venn diagram por- System—“hard power”—and generic Teams of
trays. The essence of v