LANDPOWER MAGAZINE FALL 2020 | Page 21

MAGAZINE citizens who are used to seeing war only in the news are now talking in Kyiv McDonalds or Lviv coffee shops about how tired they are of conflict . And in European capitals people are equally frustrated about the unresolved Russia / Ukraine conflict .
To combat complacency and reignite Ukraine ’ s passion to continue the push against Russian aggression , the Ukrainian military recently designed and implemented a public awareness campaign across the country . The campaign depicted soldiers on the frontlines of Eastern Ukraine conveying the message , “ I am not tired , what about you ?,” reminding Ukrainian society all that is at stake . The results proved to be promising and the effectiveness of Russia ’ s influence efforts has waned further . Then the coronavirus pandemic happened , which resulted in a major setback for the Kremlin ’ s information war strategists . At least for the time being .
A Telegram from Telegram No question , Ukraine is making progress . But Russia hasn ’ t quit . As discussed earlier , the range of information influence channels employed by the Russian Federation remained very wide until recently . Initially , when Ukraine banned Russian TV channels and the social networks Vkontakte and Odnoklassniki , it became quite difficult for Russia to reach Ukrainian consumers . Lately , however , through its agents of influence Russia acquired Ukrainian national TV channels and some popular Ukrainian websites . It has also created thematic groups on Facebook , and has recently weaponized a very popular messenger application called Telegram , which broke into the Ukrainian information space as a covert effort to subtly dictate the Ukrainian political agenda and influence the population . Since then , various insights , rumors , anonymous leaks of information , and blogs of some politicians on Telegram has created the illusion that ordinary citizens can peep through the backroom of government actions , become acquainted with government secrets , or see future political decisions . Whether some , most , or none of the information propagated by these Telegram channels is true is beside the point . The real question is the anonymity of it all . Who is actually managing these accounts ? From whose perspective is it that we are allowed this sneak a peek at these supposed government secrets ? The answer is , it ’ s nearly impossible to know for certain who is actually behind these efforts as Telegram does not require identity verification . But , we can make a reasonable assumption that Russia and its sympathizers are the ones pulling the strings .
Absent real accountability , Telegram is a fathomless digital world for the creation and promotion of information , some of which is corroborated through traditional media , but suffers no reputational or legal consequences when it is wrong . This leeway is how political infiltrators and top anonymous Telegram users evangelize about things like pending and speculative decisions of the Presidential Office , false threats to Ukraine from the United States and Europe , and so on . Needless to say , they rarely if ever attribute the information sources – these agents of influence from the Russian Federation – and continue to conduct openly anti-Ukrainian activities unabated .
But this doesn ’ t mean Ukraine hasn ’ t fought back . Movers and shakers within Ukraine ( people of influence who act in Ukraine ’ s best interest ) have employed information countermeasures to correct the record and diminish the effect of Russian propaganda proliferated through channels like Telegram . In addition , the communication efforts of the Armed Forces of Ukraine have clearly reached a new level , which helps neutralize the hybrid influence of the Russian Federation . However , there is no time to relax , because the “ mutation ” of Russian forms and means of information influence is continuously evolving . The number of followers on these Russian sponsored Telegram channels , to include service members , is growing every day . And some channels publish Armed Forces news regularly , most of which casts Ukraine ’ s military operations in a bad light . Without a doubt , experienced Ukrainian defenders have already developed immunity to these pro-Russian / anti-Ukraine feeds , but Ukraine must continue the effort to counter Russian influence through Telegram and other channels .
Conclusion
FALL 2020
Kremlin authorities have been preparing for the war against Ukraine for decades . They developed a long-term strategy , which they tested and corrected during operations inside of Ukraine and in other countries . And , although many experts claim that Russia ’ s contemporary efforts are based on the legacy Soviet propaganda system adapted for present-day applications , no one can explain why nobody was able to predict , let alone counteract , these developments .
Fortunately , despite the large scale resources annually allocated by Russia to strengthen its information influence , Ukrainian society remains clearly focused on European and Euro-Atlantic integration and the Armed Forces of Ukraine will continue to defend our land with confidence . Hence , going back to the question on the success of Russia ’ s information war : If the whole world unequivocally recognizes that it was Russia who illegally invaded the territory of sovereign Ukraine and has been waging war in Eastern Europe for more than five years , who is the winner ?
At the same time , it is important to understand that Russia and its leaders are very cunning , fanatically purposeful , and will not stop because any empire that stops growing dies . Therefore , to believe their recent talks about peace is folly . It is merely the latest tool to satisfy their imperial ambitions . The international community should unite and resist firmly on all fronts , especially on the information front . This way , in the future , the whole world does not fall prey to the Kremlin ’ s propaganda and disinformation . LC

Russia routinely uses its English language news sources like Sputnik and RT to propogate a false narrative in support its own aims .

21