Huffington Magazine Issue 31 | Page 27

Voices And since the “fiscal cliff” was “averted” and the media has shifted focus to the next big battle, discussion of the debt ceiling dead-enders and their future plans has only gotten more blithe and unconcerned. MacGillis provides a fine example of what’s been steeping in the Beltway brain since New Years Day — this passage from the Washington Post’s Chris Cillizza that treats debtceiling hostage taking as a perfectly natural and polite thing to do, never registering even a scintilla of shock over the implication of using the threat to tank the global economy as a bargaining tactic: “Make no mistake: No deal on the fiscal cliff was a political loser for Republicans; this is an issue they needed to get off the table in order to find better political ground — debt ceiling — to make their stand.” This is like saying, “Now that the issue of what to wear to brunch has been settled, we can now proceed to strip naked and slice off our own genitals with a rusty paring knife,” and never even twitching at the hot, molten insanity of the idea that was just e xpressed. MacGillis writes (and I emphasize): “So: a threat to plunge the nation’s [sic] into default and with JASON LINKINS HUFFINGTON 01.13.13 it imperil the nation and world’s economy, seen only a year and a half ago as the political equivalent of a nuclear option, is now viewed as ‘better political ground.’ What to make of this? The shift in mindset is surely in part a function of basic human nature: our Give me oxygen right now or I die and that’s that. The rise in the debt ceiling is similarly necessary.” remarkable ability — for good or ill — to adapt ourselves to new realities. More than that, though, it is a function of that far more Beltway-unique tendency, to report and comment on politics and governance as pure gamesmanship in such a way that conveys savvy but not judgment. And if it’s all a sport, who’s to object if one side has radically shifted the goalposts? Good for them, if they can get away with it. And after all, the higher the stakes in the clash, the better the story.” Some people just want to watch the world burn, and some people just want to get that story first. They’re all dangerous.