Huffington Magazine Issue 31 | Page 26

Voices see default as an ideal alternative to having to concede any points in what should be a rational process of negotiation and deal-making. (And unfortunately for everyone, a key enabler to this madness has been that former Illinois senator, who opened the door to negotiating over the debt ceiling back when he was still hopeful of a “grand bargain” on the debt.) But the enabling isn’t just happening in Congress, it’s happening in the media, as well, which is why another thing I would like to make clear is that those who see debt ceiling lunacy as a legitimate side in a debate or just one more interesting point of view among many are just as culpable in what could be a pending economic calamity as the lunatics themselves. We should not be talking about a “debate” over the debt ceiling, or portraying a rise in the debt ceiling as a thing that Democrats “want” or are bargaining to obtain. I require oxygen to continue respiring. Oxygen is not something I “want” or am bargaining to obtain. Give me oxygen right now or I die and that’s that. The rise in the debt ceiling is similarly necessary, because Congress has already agreed to spend a certain amount of money, JASON LINKINS and according to this dumb ritual, must now affirm their intentions to fulfill their previously agreed-to obligations. This is not a matter for debate — the country and the economy needs the debt ceiling rise, full stop. Henry Blodget, in taking up the cause of the trillion-dollar platinum coin, similarly characterizes the entire notion of having a “debate” over the debt ceiling as hopelessly silly-slash-bordering on bonkers, and he does so in a way that’s admirably stark and accurate: “To be clear: The “trilliondollar coin” is a ridiculous idea… But the problem is that some of the people who have been elected to lead this country have revealed themselves to be unserious, irresponsible people. How? By threatening to turn the United States of America into a deadbeat nation that refuses to pay its bills.” It wasn’t always this way. But as The New Republic’s Alec MacGillis explains, as idle talk over debt ceiling hostake-taking evolved, seemingly overnight, into a more serious and dangerous psychosis, the media coverage has shifted in reverse. Where the hostage-taking was once portrayed properly, as “brazen and unprecedented,” the media now gives the hostage-takers a pass. HUFFINGTON 01.13.13