HCBA Lawyer Magazine No. 31, Issue 1 | Page 50

propoSedCHangeStoprivateplaCeMenteXeMptionSwouldinCreaSeinveStoraCCeSS Securities law Section Chairs:­Eric­Feld­-­Wiand­Guerra­King­P.A.­&­Josef­Rosen­-­GrayRobinson,­PA With fewer and fewer companies going public and the companies that do go public waiting longer and longer before doing so, it has long been a complaint that non-accredited investors are unable to participate in attractive investment opportunities available to “accredited investors,” such as investments in private companies and offerings by certain hedge funds, private equity funds, and venture capital funds. The SEC has proposed rule changes which aim to increase access to these opportunities by: (1) expanding the definition of “accredited investor,” and (2) decreasing an issuer’s financial disclosure requirements when accepting non-accredited investors. Amendments to the definition of Accredited investor Many consider the current definition of “accredited investor” in Regulation D to be overly restrictive and overly focused on income and net worth. Currently, the most common way a natural person qualifies as an “accredited investor” is by having a net worth over $1,000,000 (excluding the value of Manyconsiderthe currentdefinitionof “accreditedinvestor” inregulationdto beoverlyrestrictive andoverlyfocusedon incomeandnetworth. a person’s primary home) or having earned income that exceeded $200,000 (or $300,000 together with a spouse) in each of the past two years with the reasonable expectation to earn over this threshold in the coming year. In response, the SEC has proposed revising the “accredited investor” definition with regard to natural persons in order to permit qualification as an accredited investor if such investor (1) has Continuedonpage49 Want­to­advertise­your­business­to­ THOUSANDS­OF­ATTORNEYSin­the­Tampa­Bay­area? Contact­[email protected]. 4 8 S E P T - O C T 2 0 2 0 | H C B A L A W Y E R