Gold Magazine December 2013 - January 2014, Issue 33 | Página 80

investing in champagne Fame and Fortune W hilst the pervading hues and flavour nuances of Champagne are deeply appreciated and held dear, sometimes the importance of quality may just be usurped by the monumental opportunity to own a piece of history, or indeed posses decadence incarnate. The following Champagne sales display the thrall of fortune and fame: 1. Having rested tumultuously on the seabed of Finland’s autonomous Aaland archipelago for nearly 200 years, a bottle of Veuve Clicquot Champagne was discovered in July 2010. Assumed to be booty from a shipwreck dat- ing to between 1825 and 1830, the bottle sold for an incredible €30,000. A bottle of Champagne from the now defunct house, Juglar, was salvaged alongside the Veuve Clicquot, and managed to secure a likewise impressive selling price of €24,000. A single buyer from Asia purchased both bottles. 2. 1916: The Jönköping, a Swedish freighter, is traversing the Gulf of Finland, having been specially commissioned to deliver wines to Tsar Nicholas II of Russia. With the world in the throes of the First World War, a German submarine struck the freighter, sending it to the seabed along with the 2,000 bottles of wine. Fast forward to 1998: Almost unbelievably, all 2,000 bottles are recovered and distributed worldwide for auction. In a poignant twist of fate, the most expensive bottle to be sold was actually done so from its original intended destination of Russia. An auction held at The Ritz-Carlton, Moscow, witnessed a bottle of vintage Heidsieck 1907 sell for an astounding $275,000. 3. This year, Champagne brand, Goût de Diamants released a very special bottle of Champagne. Whilst the house speaks highly of the flavour profile encapsulated within the bottle, depicting it as floral, refreshing, crescendoing with a creamy texture, and cadencing with a light and elegant finish, it is perhaps not the quality alone that has buyers parting with $1.2 million dollars to possess it. In keeping with the house name that translates to ‘taste of diamonds’, Goût de Diamants created a superlatively luxurious bottle, accented with an 18-carat white gold signature Superman badge logo, centred upon which is a flawless white diamond measuring 19 carats. An embodiment of prestige and fame, it is no wonder it costs a fortune. 2 1 3 are utilised in the production of ‘vintage’ Champagne. In such cases, the Champagnes are created almost exclusively (at least 80%) from this single harvest. Thereafter, the bottles are dated (indicating the year of harvest) and matured for a minimum of three years prior to release. Whilst families of vintages may be identified – such as 1993, 1990, and 1976 – each vintage Champagne has a unique taste, much like vintage still wines or single cask whiskies. Non-vintage, in contrast, is brought to fruition diachronically, 80 Gold the international investment, finance & professional services magazine of cyprus by blending a mixture of harvests in correct proportions in order to replicate a single, uniform flavour profile every year. Indeed, in the world of collecting and investing, it is vintage examples that endure, keeping – if not increasing – their value. And with attractive buy-in prices, Champagne may just serve as some muchneeded diversity within a collector’s investment portfolio. “There are a group of investors who feel that there is only one way that Champagne prices are headed, and that is up,” notes Geoffrey Troy of New York Wine Warehouse, the North American auction partner for wines at Christie’s. Troy elaborates: “We are beginning to see a number of serious wine collectors who are buying serious amounts of Champagne as an investment.” Official figures concur. London-based fine wine exchange, Liv-ex, known for operating the established and respected Fine Wine 100 Index, also runs the Champagne 25 Index, which tracks the prices of the world’s top vintage Champagnes. Tracking a five-year period to July of this year, Liv-ex published figures suggesting that the Champagne 25 Index has risen by 32%, in contrast with the Fine Wine 100 Index, which rose by just 3%. Indeed, in the nine-month period concluding the third quarter of this year, the Champagne 25 Index rose by 9.7%, with big strides taken in particular by Louis Roederer’s Cristal 1996, increasing by 9.2%, Taittinger Comte Champagne 2002, 8.9%, and Krug 1996, 7.4%. For those not wishing, at present, to commit to the rich heights of, for examp K