acquired on the spur of the moment. They hanker after and crave for compromises in their class interests and betray the people by not continuing struggle until the goal is reached completely and fully achieving the ideals. 15 th august 1947( the transfer of power) made it clear. It is not necessary to tell particularly that all these bad results are caused because of giving protection to the interests of upper classes. Moreover understanding politics with a scientific outlook is lacking. They depend on blind beliefs and religious faiths. So we find in them a lot of empiricism. They fail to coordinate the relation between art, science and literature in a scientific way. They treat them as separate things having no inter relationship. As they do not have accurate philosophical perspective they cannot make alliance between material world and intellectual world.
The situation in the workingclass party will be entirely different from the bourgeois parties. Democracy is definitely followed from the lower levels to the upper levels. Though the lower committees abide by the decisions of the higher committees, they by submitting their reports from time to time teach and show the correct way to the higher committees. Through reports, circulars and documents the higher committees teach and show the way to the lower committees. There will be mutual teaching of the tasks between people and party leaders vice versa. Every worker who acquired awareness will always be helping in the formation of the policy of his party. That is why he is able to put into practice the party policy actively as his own policy.
Though artistes, historians, scientists etc. have the capacity to look with different perspectives and various angles there is a possibility for them to combine their angles of vision. It is the characteristic of the leadership of working class to examine the angles of all visions, 20 and merge the good of all those visions in its policies and programmes. There will not be such an opportunity in any bourgeois organization. Only in the working class party there is such a possibility. Since the high ideal of all in the working class party is the same there will not be any differences between the ideal, though there may be differences in selecting the tactics.
With either exclusive vision of art or with scientific vision or with vision of literature we can explore and digest the truth of life. But it can not be the absolute truth. It will be a fragment of truth. It will be one angle, one part and one form of the truth. Only when we consider all the angles and from all directions the complete truth of life and true multifaceted nature will be revealed. REALATIVE TRUTHS AND ABSOLUTE TRUTH
That is why, even a person without culture can also find truth of life. But it many not be explicit. It may not be the absolute truth. It could be a half truth or a speck of the truth. The person who can clearly find the absolute truth of life is the real philosopher, real scientist, the real artist and the real politician. As stated by Engels the absolute truth forms from relative truths. So either art or science or literature or politics can not be totally isolated and separate from one another. Literature also becomes an art and science. Science also becomes an art and literature. The essence of the both is the mixture of science, literature and art.
Different sciences, art and literature are various points of view and different forms of explaining and resolving the phenomena of life, truth and the goal.
Understanding a problem properly and comprehensively means, looking through all these points of view and understanding the full view of the problem including its nature and its antecedents.
Communism comprehends in such a way. W ith the help of the perspectives of artistes and scientists it understands problems comprehensively. So the communist criticism generally will be nearer to absolute truth. Along with class society, the partiality in truth too perishes and perfection emerges. COMPREHENSIVENESS IS POSSIBLE!
But is it possible to any person or to any theory to achieve comprehensiveness or perfection at any time? In its true meaning it may not be possible.
Karl Marx gained full and comprehensive knowledge on the problems of the then economical, political and scientific fields. So in those circumstances he could become the final authority on those subjects. A classic of good standard on a particular problem remains as a standard one until that problem is resolved and until the particular situation changes. Not only that, we can call it omnipresent in the past, present and future. In the light of new circumstances and with the newly born contradictions if there are any mistakes that were not found in the theories or in the writings of the past they can now be seen clearly. So with the change of conditions there will be a change in understanding the problems and in the methods of understanding them. Those which were considered to be mistakes in the past would be corrected now and rectified. Marxism-Leninism allows such a progressive change. After Lenin, we can say the life of Stalin and his work are comprehensive.
So, while the bourgeois arts, science and literature propose partial humanism and partial intellectualism and take them as ideals, Communism is marching forward by creating full humanism and perfect intellect and is considering them as absolute ideals.
( 1946)( This Article is Completed) �
Class Struggle