Australian Doctor Australian Doctor 7th September 2018 | Page 5

NEWS 5
australiandoctor. com. au 7 SEPTEMBER 2018

NEWS 5

Wrong: 2 in 3 catheter insertions

Whose woo? Midwives college denies dark arts

Carmel Sparke TWO-THIRDS of peripheral intravenous catheters are inserted into areas not recommended by guidelines, an international study led by Australian researchers shows.
In the study, hundreds of health professionals assessed 40,620 peripheral intravenous catheters in 51 countries.
They found that while the forearm was the recommended site in an adult, most catheters were inserted in the hand, wrist or antecubital veins.
One in 10 were unnecessarily painful and a further 10 % had signs of malfunction, said the authors, led by Dr Evan Alexandrou( PhD) from Western Sydney University. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2018; online.
Critics slam the midwives college for awarding a reflexology course CPD points.
Jocelyn Wright THE Australian College of Midwives stands
accused of introducing“ dark age” practices
after awarding CPD points for a training course
promoting burning dried mugwort to correct a
breech birth position.
The ancient Chinese medicine intervention
known as‘ moxibustion’ involves lighting the
mugwort, which is then placed near the woman
’ s fifth toe in the belief that the heat on the
acupressure point releases pregnancy hormones
. These hormones supposedly lead to
uterine contractions that move the baby.
The technique is included in a midwife
reflexology course, accredited with 62 CPD
points, run by midwife and reflexologist Dr
Lyndall Mollart( PhD).
heard of Adelaide University’ s obstetrics and gynaecology unit, has slammed the course.
“ I’ m appalled that midwifery among some practitioners could see a return to the dark ages, by introducing therapies to midwives that are unproven, not audited, and could cause great conflict among hospital clinicians where evidence-based medicine occurs,” says Professor MacLennan.
“ We all want safe birth with minimal surgical and medical intervention. But alternative midwives cannot claim this ground without evidence for their beliefs and nonsensical woo.”
Dr Mollart’ s course also includes the use of acupressure for reducing labour duration and pain, as well as reflexology for increasing the mother’ s milk supply. She denied she was practising“ woo”, saying there were a number of randomised controlled trials that suggested moxibustion could correct a breech position.
“ Of all the studies that have been done on moxibustion, there’ s been no bad side effects
must be a reason,” Dr Mollart said.
“ Personally, I teach midwives reflexology and acupressure. The reason I teach those two is because they’ re not unproven. If medicine believes randomised controlled trials are the golden standard, with those techniques I can show there is evidence behind them.”
She added:“ We can’ t bury our heads in the sand. If 50-80 % of pregnant women are using some type of complementary medicine or therapy, then we’ ve got to make sure the health professionals who work with them at least know what the evidence is on each one.”
The Australian Midwives College also dismissed Professor MacLennan’ s claims, saying the college encouraged midwives to understand complementary medicine techniques rather than adopting them as part of their practice.
A spokesperson stressed alternative therapies were not a substitute for obstetric consultation or referral and that the college also offered its own clinically based professional
Professor Alastair MacLennan, a former
for the baby and if it doesn’ t turn, then there
education courses for midwives.

Cashed-up corporates on the rise

FROM PAGE 1
Significantly, he says
the company has more than 80 registrars
in training— more than any other
corporate.
By July next year, he insists that
Myhealth will have overtaken Primary
to become the country’ s second-largest
GP corporate and he hopes
to match IPN in scale within the next
5-10 years.
Main GP corporates
Estimated number of doctors
2000
1800
1500 1000 500
1000
400
200
150 150
120 100 85
“ Our success really comes down to
our doctors,” he says.
“ If you pay people big money to
join you, you select a certain type of
doctor, whereas to join Myhealth, you
have to pay money— which means
that people join who are proud of the
brand and want to be part of it.”
Half his business is owned by Crescent
Capital, a healthcare investor
with a stake in a range of businesses
including the National Home Doctor
Service, Australian Clinical Labs, Sun-
Doctors skin cancer clinics and a chain
of dental practices.
Crescent Capital had never before
been involved in“ daytime” general
practice, says Dr Liang, but it saw an
opportunity in Myhealth’ s model
that is as much about keeping its GPs
happy as it is about the patients.
“ Our most important customers
are the GPs themselves,” Dr Liang
says.
But old hands such as Dr Khaled
el-Sheikh, who founded the rural corporate
Tristar Medical Group in 2003,
remain sceptical.
“ These new corporates are not in
the health business for the long term,”
he tells Australian Doctor.
“ Some organisations are promoting
it to get the market hyped up so
they can sell and collect fast cash.”
But along with the hunt for dollars,
are the investors changing corporate medicine? For industry analyst David Low, the fundamentals of the game remain the same: patient convenience.“ From my perspective, what Primary offers and I think what Myhealth offers as well, is what a lot of patients want: a big clinic that is available for long hours, and is easier than going to your local GP and having to wait a couple of weeks and not getting an appointment,” says Mr Low, the executive director of Australian healthcare research at investment bank JP Morgan.
The corporate investors also seem to be interested because of the cash opportunities of the technology revolution.
Myhealth, for instance, is focused on building IT infrastructure to allow electronic booking, airline-style electronic check-in computers and an app for patients.
When Dr Malcolm Parmenter took over as CEO at Primary last year, he was also talking about innovations that you suspect would have made
Dr Bateman blink— such as offering repeat scripts online to regular patients and emailing test results. He was also flagging various ideas that included setting up cubicles with stand-up terminals staffed by doctors to deal with simple presentations.
“ It’ s a bit like casualty and there is quick throughput,” he told Australian Doctor.
But then there is that other attraction for patients— a lasting relationship with a GP. Terry Barnes, a former health policy adviser to former health minister Tony Abbott, says:“ I think there is a convenience factor for large
corporatised practices, particularly
outside standard hours, but I think if
you ask the vast majority of patients,
they like going to the old-fashioned
family practice.
“ Healthcare is still the most intimate
form of professional service and
people like to have an intimate relationship
with their doctor. The big corporates
are realising that.”
While the mass takeover of general
practice by corporates widely
predicted back in the 1990s has not
occurred, some doctors feel that the
only thing wrong with the prediction
is the time frame. Further growth is
Dr Geoffrey Edelsten in his practice waiting room back in 1985.
inevitable in an environment where
governments have been unwilling to
invest.
“ While the Medicare GP financing
structure remains broadly the way it
is, it is hard to escape the conclusion
that the GP corporates will continue
to grow,” says Dr Bill Coote, a former
AMA secretary general and long-time
GP commentator.
“ Corporates can achieve economies
of scale by exploiting opportunities
around access to capital, practice
infrastructure and facilities, opening
hours and administration.
Scepticism remains, of course. At
the National Press Club in July, AMA
president Dr Tony Bartone warned
that GPs see general practice becoming
“ increasingly corporatised, burdened
with more red tape”.
“ This is not the future that GPs
want to see,” Dr Bartone said.
What is clear is that there are
increasing numbers of corporate
voices— backed with big dollars—
who want to persuade GPs to think
otherwise.