PROFESSOR Jillian Kril needs brains. Healthy human brains. For more than 20 years, she has been collecting and dissecting the |
|||
brain to unlock some of the big mysteries in |
|||
medical science: Is there a cure for dementia |
|||
? Is it possible to reverse the damage of |
|||
alcohol abuse on brain tissue? |
|||
Diseased brains have been relatively easy |
|||
to acquire— the NSW Brain Tissue Resource |
|||
Centre( BTRC), where she is director, houses |
|||
about 500 preserved donor cases— but it is |
|||
experiencing a chronic shortage of healthy |
|||
controls. |
|||
“ Controls are vital because almost |
|||
all research is conducted as a comparison |
|||
between healthy controls and disease |
|||
groups of interest,” Professor Kril says. |
|||
“ Even when we are comparing between |
|||
diseases, neurologically normal controls are |
|||
included in the experimental design.” |
|||
Professor Kril explains that the brains |
|||
she has acquired over the years have been |
|||
crucial to her own field of research. |
Program, which accounts for most of its dis- |
brain becomes unviable and essentially use- |
Raising public awareness around brain |
Among more than 500 studies published |
eased brain cases, the BTRC’ s main source |
less for the centre’ s research purposes. |
donor programs and signing up more con- |
as a result of the BTRC’ s extensive collection |
for healthy controls has mostly dried up. |
The second issue for the BTRC’ s short- |
trols can help address this issue, but she |
is a paper she authored that remains one of |
The NSW Department of Forensic Med- |
age headache is that it can only collect |
says ensuring doctors are aware of their |
the most cited studies on alcohol-related |
icine, which receives all sudden, acciden- |
brains from the department when there has |
patient’ s donor status is paramount in pre- |
brain damage. It was published in Neurosci- |
tal and violent deaths, allows BTRC staff to |
been a full autopsy— and not all autopsies |
venting post-mortem delays in collection. |
ence in 1997. 1 |
visit and assess the reports of death to the |
fall into this category now. |
“ There’ s a time-sensitive period where |
“ It was the first work to actually show |
coroner for potential donations. |
Dr Claire Shepherd, director of the |
they need to sign the death certificate so |
that alcohol abuse did actually kill brain |
If a deceased individual meets certain |
BTRC’ s sister facility the Sydney Brain Bank |
that we can collect the brain tissue in as |
cells,” she says. |
criteria, then the next of kin will be con- |
( SBB), says the controls shortage has had an |
short a time period as possible.” |
“ It demonstrated the selectivity of neu- |
tacted to discuss the donation and consent- |
even more profound impact on their work. |
Professor Kril also wants doctors to bet- |
ronal loss in people who abuse alcohol. That |
ing process. |
Despite owning almost 600 donor cases, |
ter assess and record patients’ alcohol con- |
is, the damage does not occur universally |
“ As you can imagine, if you’ ve just found |
the number of true controls in the SBB’ s col- |
sumption, including frequency, amount, |
but targets cells in specific brain regions.” |
out your relative has died and there’ s going |
lection is“ less than 2-3 %” of the total cases, |
type of alcohol consumed and dietary |
This loss underlies the clinical symptoms |
to be an autopsy, having someone ring up |
says Dr Shepherd, who is also an Alzheim- |
factors. |
of a person with alcohol addiction, Professor |
and say,‘ excuse me, can I have the brain?’ |
er’ s disease researcher at UNSW. |
“ Unfortunately notes often just record |
Kril adds. |
does sound like a terrible thing,” Profes- |
“ We should have a number of control |
subjective assessments such as‘ moderate |
sor Kril says.“ But the consent rates are |
cohorts that are age-appropriate and they |
drinker’ or‘ heavy drinker’ without the use |
|
A lot of people found that being able to give a relative’ s tissue for research was something they wanted to do when they were grieving. |
really very high. A lot of people found that being able to give their relative’ s tissue for research, for purely altruistic reasons, was something that they wanted to do at the time that they were grieving.”
The problem has been the chronic underfunding of the NSW Coroner’ s Court.
In recent years the court has faced a bigger workload, partly due an increase in the
|
should be matched to every disease cohort we have and currently we’ re nowhere near that,” she tells Australian Doctor.
Dr Shepherd co-authored a 2015 study published in Nature Communications that showed that abnormalities in neuronal communication pathways contribute to synaptic loss, which is thought to be one of the earliest events in Alzheimer’ s disease
|
of validated instruments,” she says.
Not only would more detailed patient
records help fulfil the wishes of individuals
who signed up to be a donor, but it would
also create more opportunities for researchers
to continue exploring, despite its dull
goo, the most fascinating organ in the
human body.
For Professor Kril, the people who
|
reporting by doctors of deaths from unnat- |
pathogenesis. 2 |
choose to take part in this great scientific |
|
The BTRC’ s collection holds about 150 |
ural causes. |
“[ The study ] allows us to get a mecha- |
endeavour are fascinating enough without |
controls but unfortunately most are already |
The state government’ s Department |
nism for how we think the nerve cells stop |
having to contemplate any metaphysical |
‘ matched up’— based on their age and gen- |
of Forensic Medicine procedures are also |
communicating with each other in Alzheim- |
issues associated with the brain— such as |
der— with diseased brains in cohort studies, |
an issue. The department must determine |
er’ s disease,” she explains. |
its link with consciousness. |
leaving very few unmatched controls avail- |
the cause of a person’ s death using the |
However, even this study was restricted |
“ The generosity of the donors is probably |
able for researchers requesting tissue sam- |
least invasive procedures possible, which |
by the number of controls available— only |
the standout thing,” she says. |
ples outside of these parameters. |
means it must review all medical records |
10 were used in the study to compare with |
“ I don’ t really ponder the consciousness |
“ Matching occurs dependent on selec- |
of the deceased person as well as perform |
disease-affected cases. |
of the person, but I have a deep respect for |
tion criteria. A case that is suitable for one |
CT scanning on the body. It is only then, if |
The SBB recruits all of its cases through |
the donors and their families— the selfless- |
study may be unsuitable for another because |
the cause is still unclear, that an autopsy is |
prospective longitudinal programs and |
ness of the gift, the positivity in their altru- |
the investigator has set specific inclu- |
performed. |
relies heavily on the BTRC to supply age- |
ism and their faith in our ability as scientists |
sion and exclusion criteria,” Professor Kril
explains.
Despite having about 600 people
enrolled in its Using our Brains Donor
|
This process can cause delays of up to three to five days. This is a serious issue for BTRC because if it cannot collect the brain from the body within 24 hours of death, the |
matched controls to researchers.
“ It would be nice to at least have at least 10-15 % of the collection being controls rather than the current 2-3 %,” Dr Shepherd says.
|
to deliver. It’ s humbling.” References: 1. Neuroscience 1997; 79:983-998. 2. Nature Communications 2015; online. |