Alessio Gugliotta, Francesco Niglia and Laura Schina | |||
Table 4: The synopticâscore table of evaluation of interest in the selected cases | |||
# ID |
Transferability |
User Centricity |
Overall Evaluation |
1 |
MEDIUM |
LOW |
No interest |
2 |
MEDIUM |
LOW |
No interest |
3 |
HIGH |
MEDIUM |
High interest |
4 |
MEDIUM |
MEDIUM |
Medium interest |
5 |
HIGH |
MEDIUM |
High interest |
6 |
MEDIUM |
LOW |
No interest |
7 |
LOW |
LOW |
No interest |
8 |
MEDIUM |
MEDIUM |
Medium interest |
9 |
LOW |
MEDIUM |
No interest |
10 |
MEDIUM |
MEDIUM |
Medium interest |
11 |
MEDIUM |
MEDIUM |
Medium interest |
12 |
MEDIUM |
LOW |
No interest |
13 |
MEDIUM |
LOW |
No interest |
14 |
LOW |
LOW |
No interest |
15 |
HIGH |
LOW |
Low interest |
16 |
MEDIUM |
MEDIUM |
Medium interest |
17 |
HIGH |
MEDIUM |
High interest |
18 |
MEDIUM |
MEDIUM |
Medium interest |
19 |
MEDIUM |
LOW |
No interest |
20 |
HIGH |
LOW |
Low interest |
21 |
MEDIUM |
LOW |
No interest |
22 |
MEDIUM |
LOW |
No interest |
23 |
HIGH |
MEDIUM |
High interest |
24 |
MEDIUM |
MEDIUM |
Medium interest |
25 |
MEDIUM |
LOW |
No interest |
26 |
HIGH |
MEDIUM |
High interest |
27 |
MEDIUM |
MEDIUM |
Medium interest |
28 |
LOW |
LOW |
No interest |
29 |
MEDIUM |
MEDIUM |
Medium interest |
30 |
HIGH |
MEDIUM |
High interest |
31 |
MEDIUM |
LOW |
No interest |
32 |
MEDIUM |
LOW |
No interest |
33 |
MEDIUM |
LOW |
No interest |
34 |
MEDIUM |
MEDIUM |
Medium interest |
35 |
MEDIUM |
MEDIUM |
Medium interest |
36 |
MEDIUM |
LOW |
No interest |
37 |
MEDIUM |
MEDIUM |
Medium interest |
38 |
MEDIUM |
LOW |
No interest |
39 |
HIGH |
MEDIUM |
High interest |
40 |
LOW |
MEDIUM |
No interest |