•
•
53’Biochar/Classic Carbon + UV: Effect mix of
Accepted & Disputed by Western Mainstream(WM)
■ 53’Biochar/Classic Carbon + UV:(calling “Classic Carbon” here to differentiate with
section 55’Nano Material treating) Largest promotor is Biochar specific type NGOs
that are internationally networked with some mainstream backing: (biochar-
international+), There are significant underexplored effects(often not water related)
in mainstream biochar, yet there is further large effect gap between those and some
of fringe group biochar production & usage method
•
•
eg: Material purpose sorted & treated 600-1200°C solid wood carbon is each
used for different applications”: difference of porous honeycomb size, structure
durability, thru or nonthru pores etc. Their commercialized claim(not really water
related) effect and durability seem superior to Activated Carbon- likely at least
partly due to the way it is used(Maruko-Denshi, NaraTanka 奈奈良炭化⼯工業 +),.
WM promoted biochar can be produced from biomass by pyrolysis without
generating CO 2 (unlike SuperCritical water decomposition), which has economical
incentives around its sequestering. Activated Carbon filter is a part of widely used
standard water treatment system, especially at fine filtration at last stage of public
drinking water production..
linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm - Ben Rusuisiak: Specialty Cleantech Analysis, Vancouver, Canada
274