WristWatch Magazine #18 | Seite 112

AKRIVIA RR: ” I am not the person to revolutionize watchmaking; for me it is all about tradition. But that does not mean that I have nothing new to bring to the table. My case is a completely new design in this horological segment, the dials of each timepiece in my collection are made using some rare classical techniques that are seldom used today because they are too time consuming for many commercial brands to execute. A main point for me is that a watch must always remain sleek, sober and understated, because only in this way can it become a timeless object for the future, not subject to changes in style and fashion twenty or a hundred years down the road. Yet, when you go deeper in the movement and the soul of the watch, aficionados can discover the complexity that lies behind this visible simplicity. In my view a beautiful object has to have some mystery hidden away inside. I am firmly convinced from the reactions I receive that there is definite future for watches like minethat approach timekeeping with a traditionalist approach.” means quality is not only what you see but also what is inside, only visible to another watchmaker. In any case, in order to have a perfectly functioning watch that will work well far into the future, this is a mandatory way to work I think. Also, it reflects my brand name, AkriviA. which in Greek translates as ‘precision’. On a personal note, I really enjoy working on a component until it is perfect; I don’t care how long it takes or even if people will see it. I do it for myself. This kind of work over the course of the day makes me feel relaxed and in balance, my way of being ‘Zen’ perhaps’” he said with a smile. Another aspect that myself and several other commentators online have mentioned is AkriviA’s design; very classical, yet different from the mainstream and fresh without going over the top. Personally, I feel the clean lines seem to make the workmanship stand out even more, so this is a good thing, but if you are looking for a flashy timepiece, his approach might not fill the bill. As young as Rexhep is, he is not out to ‘revolutionize’ watchmaking; in his heart he is a traditionalist. This is perhaps the reason why another watchmaker, none other than the legendary Kari Voutilainen, has voiced a very high opinion of Rexhep’s timepieces, as Kari also is a man of subtle gestures rather than wild brushstrokes. I could therefore not resist asking Rexhep the loaded question about how he planned to profile his watches from all the others in an already overflowing marketplace: 112 WRISTWATCH | 2016