Vanderbilt Political Review Winter 2014 | Page 13

MARCH 2014 tions? Not necessarily. History suggests that the American public elects presidential candidates who have conviction in their principles but who are also likeable. Successful candidates from either party have been culturally conservative but functionally progressive. What is clear, however, is that ultraconservative right-wing Tea Party contenders will never succeed, just as the desperate 1970’s Democratic experiment to field anti-war, pro-union, far-left nominees failed miserably. Ideological purity versus electability is a false choice. Electoral reality is nothing but vote bank arithmetic, and the compelling mandate for the Republican national party should not just be to advocate ideological views but to select conservative candidates who can win elections. Bey