Association under Rule 3(2) of A.P. Civil Services
(Recognition of Service Association) Rules 2001.
2. Submission of petitions and memoranda by service
Associations/Union under rule (4) of A.P.Civil Services
(Recognition of service Association) rules 2001.
2. For the sake of completeness part provisions of
Rule 3(2) of A.P. Civil Services (Recognition of Service Association) Rules 2001, is extracted below :
“Rule 3(2) : The Government may withdraw the recog
nition accorded to any service association after giving
an opportunity to that association of making a represen
tation against such withdrawal:
(a) If the service association :
i. Takes up or supports the cause of any individual
Government employee in matters relating to the
conditions of his service;
ii. ....
iii. ....
vii. Engages or assists in engaging any strike or
demonistration of a type which would lead to
disorder or other similar activity or incitement
therrto;
viii. ....
(e) The service association/union does not furnish
annually to the Government the total no. of its mem
bers and a list of office bearers, and updated copy
of the buy-laws or constitution and audited annual
statement of its accounts through proper channel
after the annual generalbody meeting so as to reach
the Government before the 1st day of July, in every
year;
(f) The Service association fails to furnish a list of its
members as and when required by the Government;
....”
3. All the Recognised Service Associations are
further informed that certain instances have come to the
notice of the Government that the provisions of A.P. Civil
Services (Recognition of service Association) Rules 2001.
are being voilated while making representations to Hon’ble
Chief Minister/Ministers/Chief Secretary etc., hampering
smooth functioning of the system of administration. It has
also been noticed that certain Associations are representing for the cause of individual Government employee along
with a group with regard to transfers, postings and service
conditions etc. it is reminded that such activities, attract
provision of Rule 3(2) of A.p.C.S(ROSA) Rules, 2001.
4. Government in exercise of the provision of
under Rule 4(2) of A.P. Civil Services (Recognition of Service Association) Rules, 2001 direct all the Principal Office
Bearers of Recognized Service Associations that while
making representation to Hon’ble Chief Minister/Ministers/
Chief Secretary etc., only principal office bearers, not exceeding 10 members, should meet the concerned authorities. They should also not indulge in raising any slogans
etc., while meeting such authorities or indulge in any act or
misconduct, as every Government employee is governed
by the provisions of A.P.Civil Services(Conduct)Rules, 1964.
5. They are also directed not to represent the cases
of any individual Government employee’s matters relating
to the conditions of their service, transfers etc., as such
employee who may be aggrieed, can represent themselves
to the concerned authorities and seek redressal of their
grievance which depends purely on administrative exigencies.
6. High Court of Andhra Pradesh while disposing
off WPMP No. 42488 of 2013 in W.P. 20913 of 2011, dt.
23-12-2013, affidavit filed by the State Government seeking modification of order of the High Court in W. P. No.
@Á|æj·T˝Ÿ 2014
20913 of 2011, dt. 16-8-2011, and seeking liberty of the
High Court to treat the period of 38 days of A.P.Secretariat
Seemandhra Employees Fourm as Earned Leave/to be
earned/Eligible Leave in terms of G.O.Ms.No.82, Finance
(FR.I) Department dated 29-03-2012, pending W.P.No.
20913 of 2011 on the file of the High Court; also made the
following order:
“we see no reason to distingush between the two sets
of agitating employees and the petition is accordingly
ordered in terms of the earlier order dated 05-03-2012.
Thereby, the State shall treat the agitating employees
Seemandhra region on par with the agitating employees
of Telangana region as was done earlier. This modifica
tion is however subject to the condition that the State
take all positive steps to ensure discipline amongst the
employees and see that no act or action of insubordination or indiscipline, ion violation of settled norms, is
tolerated. In such an event, it would be opens to the
state to take strict measuries in accordance with law to
maintain proper discipline and decorum amongst its
employees in public interest. To elaborate this, if the
service conduct rules prohibit the Government
employees from resorting to strike, the same amounts
to misconduct. Obviously no measure can be taken by
the Executive Government to circum vent the pr