UNSW Academic Poster eBooklet Post-Event version | Page 33

l Thinking ENGINEERING
Melissa Knothe Tate Audio Recording
l Thinking ENGINEERING
ngineering education xtbook to real life rs and mentors and ocesses by designing
king skills
isk taking to grow nnovation
textbook to real life ges to the nascent sponses include
and so ‘ messy ’ ( when solve )…
I frame the problem ? eline idealisations are
dge underpinning the ration of core course eering student learns niversity studies . The deled by the course ive lectures ( multipart , y concepts of circa 20 urse instructor models , the process of g failures and of innovation ).
t experience in the company ( 4-5 students k tutorials .
FIG . 1 – BLUE SKY MATERIALS SOLUTIONS
Can we use our understanding of mechanics of biological materials to design and manufacture mechanically superior biomaterials ?
AUSTRALIAN FLORA / FAUNA ‘ INSPO ’
IDEATION – identify with your natural system
-
Observe and empathise with the natural system
-
Identify inspirational features & mechanisms
-
This is the mechanistic equivalent [ hows ] to the
root cause analysis series of whys
-
Pick
one
or
two
particularly
inspirational
structure-function
properties
related
to
mechanics of materials
BIOMATERIALS ’ APPLICATIONS inspired by your
property è engineering systems approach
TRANSLATION AND COMMERCIALISATION ASPECTS
IN CLASS TUTORIALS pitch decks via start ups
FIG . 2 - ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS Why do biomaterials and devices fail ?
EXAMPLE REMIT : A multinational orthopaedics firm contacts your start up . Their successfully rolled out SonicAnchor implant is showing long term shortcomings for anchoring of tendon in cancellous bone . With loading , the sponge like material that fills the porous bone is breaking up and causing particulate matter to collect at attachment sites . With time , macrophages and osteoclasts start to resorb the bone at these sites and the anchor pulls out . They have requested a failure analysis from to demonstrate how “ too early load bearing ” by patients can cause this negative outcome .
PROFESSIONAL CORRESPONDENCE WITH CLIENT ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS : TOYOTA ’ S SERIES OF WHY ? S
ENGINEERING SYSTEMS APPROACH & ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS
TECHNICAL REPORT f Biomedical Engineering - Graduate School of Biomedical Engineering , Faculty of Engineering