2 SONYA VERKHOTUROVA
agreement . Finally , I will highlight some other problematic implications if the statement of the title is true after all .
I
At first glance , the idea of morality being relative seems plausible , due to the existence of diverse opinions on the matter of morality . This summarises the most common reasoning which the advocators of moral relativism follow . There is a diversity of different cultures which possess different moralities , and on what grounds can one tell them that their morality is wrong if we do not possess the moral truth ? Suppose some argue that they hold the moral truths , then it seems that one is placing oneself in the superior position in relation to the other societies . This is known as cultural chauvinism and is widely criticised nowadays due to the presence of the negative sentiment against colonialism and imperialism . Yet this premise in itself seems to be neutral to the argument , because absence of diversity does not preclude the existence of an absolute standard ; in the same way , the existence of many scientific theories about the origin of the universe does not preclude that there is one that is true . A cultural relativist will elucidate this idea by saying that morality does not resemble a scientific theory , rather it does resemble etiquette . For example , in Europe smiling to a stranger is seen as a sign of politeness . Whereas in Russia , it is recognised as an act of disrespect , thus the same action translates differently . A British tourist , who comes to Russia ought to respect this norm and act accordingly under the moral pressure . Relativists claim that it is a similar case with morality : the right thing to do is to show respect towards the societal norms . The strength of this argument is that it promotes toleration which is viewed of great importance , and it may be useful for us to remain conscious of cultural differences .
Although moral relativism may appeal to us as a pluralistic morality reflective of the current consensus about the importance of toleration and respect , this should not be taken as a value . This essay will firstly draw the distinction between etiquette and morality : this essay argues that the latter beholds more value and has more significant implications for all humans . With this in mind , the necessary conclusion that follows the relativist ’ s line of argument is that one is forced to admit to the permissibility of any , even utterly abhorrent , action