The Mistery of Belicena Villca revealed to us by another way , this time external , the strategic principle mentioned . Although I can anticipate that the result will be negative , it is convenient to examine such a possibility of external search as its analysis will allow understanding various gnoseological and cultural aspects that affect man .
If we accept the hermetic principle of equivalence between macrocosm and microcosm it will be evident to us that all the laws of the macrocosm are reflected in analogous laws of the microcosm . But such correspondence is far from being a mere passive reflection between structures . Man , discovering and formulating laws , unbalances that relationship and assumes a prominent role . As a consequence of that dominant attitude appears now , separating the Self from the macrocosm , a cultural model elaborated by a cultural subject based on principles and concepts of a cultural structure . In the Hyperborean Wisdom , Dr . Siegnagel , these three elements are defined and studied ; synthetically , I ' ll tell you that the " cultural subject " is only the animic subject acting dynamically on a " cultural structure " constituted in the " sphere of shadow " of the psyche ; likewise , when the animic subject acts in the " rational sphere ", is referred to as the " rational subject "; and if it manifests in the " sphere of consciousness ", " conscious subject "; but always , the Self is immersed in the animic subject or Soul , be its field of action rational , cultural or conscious .
Thus , the " cultural model " is the main responsible for the deformed vision that man has of himself and of the world , since it is interposed between the macrocosm and the microcosm . The cultural model is a content of the cultural structure of a collective or sociocultural nature ; therefore , it consists of a systematic set of concepts , proposed by the cultural subject and translated into one or two common languages , e . g . mathematical and linguistic . In short , the cultural model is usually composed of mathematical principles and cultural premises . The Self of man when it is confused with the conscious subject , jointly accepts as representations of external entities , as their truth , the cultural objects that come from the intermediary cultural model , cultural objects whose meaning has been proposed by the cultural subject as a premise in habitual language .
Let us now examine what man means by " law of nature ". Without getting into complications it can be said that a law of nature is the mathematical quantification of a significant relationship between aspects or magnitudes of a phenomenon . We clarify this definition . Given a phenomenon it is possible that through observation and empirical experimentation certain " aspects " of it may be differentiated . If among the various aspects that stand out , some of them are “ significantly related between them ”, and if that relationship has a statistical probability , that is , it is repeated a large number of times or is permanent , then a " law of nature " can be enunciated . For this , it is necessary that the “ aspects ” of the phenomenon can be reduced to magnitudes such that the " significant relationship " is reduced to " relationship between magnitudes " , that is , a mathematical function . The " Laws " of Physics have been deduced in a similar way .
The concept of " law of nature " that I have exposed is modern and aims to " control " the phenomenon rather than to explain it , following the current trend that subordinates the scientific to the technological . Thus there are phenomena “ Governed ” by eminent laws that are not only accepted as determining factors but rather , they are indissolubly incorporated into the phenomenon itself , forgetting , or simply ignoring , that these are rational quantifications . It is what occurs , for example , when the phenomenon of a falling object is noticed and its affirmed that such a thing has happened because " the law of gravity acted ". Here the " law of gravity ” is eminent , and although “ other laws are known to exist ” which “ they also intervene but with less intensity ”, it is blindly believed that the object in its fall obeys Newton ' s law and that this " law of nature " has been the cause of its displacement . However , the concrete fact is that the phenomenon does not obey any eminent law . The phenomenon just happens and there is nothing in it that intentionally points to a law of nature , and still less an eminent law . The phenomenon is an
213