The Missouri Reader Vol. 37, Issue 1 | Page 23

measure the growth of a student‘s listening skill over a short period of time. With respect to intentionally teaching students‘ to listen more critically, a teacher would be prudent to begin the school year by measuring the listening comprehension level of each of his or her students to establish a baseline listening level. A student‘s listening level can be established using the passages of any commercially published informal reading inventory. The teacher reads a graded passage to a student and asks the student questions related to the passage reading. If the student is successful in answering 75% of the questions correctly, he or she is moved to the next grade level. The listening level is established at the last grade-level passage where the student answers 75% of the questions correctly. This baseline information is valuable in helping the teacher estimate students‘ reading capacity and vocabulary development; and ultimately, over time, helps when evaluating how well the student has been responding to listening instruction. How often a teacher intentionally adapts a reading lesson to focus instead on listening comprehension depends upon how well students are performing on the comprehension tasks required of the listening-adapted lessons. Teachers should modulate the frequency of their teaching depending on how well students respond to the prompts and questions in the listening adapted During and after Reading Format, or the amount of information recalled during the Guided Listening Procedure, or in the number of predictions or quality of the discussions in the Directed Listening-Thinking Activity. If students are not doing well on the listening aspects of the lessons, then more lessons focused on listening need to be taught. Conclusion A considerable part of the school day is spent listening (Barbe & Myers, 1954; Cox, 2005; Rankin, 1928). Listening is a key to student success; furthermore, accurate listening is needed for virtually all adult jobs; listening is key as members of society become more and more dependent on cell phones and other forms of technology; and as more and more books are accessed through various listening formats, listening is becoming an alternative choice for reading for enjoyment and information. Yet, teaching listening skills has a history of being ignored in our schools. In this article, a common sense method is proposed to teach critical listening with little change to the daily curriculum. Critical listening can be addressed by substituting the reading component of the before, during, and after reading lesson format with a listening component, or by substituting the reading aspect of a reading comprehension strategy with listening. Furthermore, audio-assisted passages can be practiced while teaching comprehension reading skills using materials that students find too difficult to read. Paul and Elder (2008) emphasize the importance of teachers intentionally addressing the skill of listening: ―Since students spend a good deal of their time listening, and since developing critical listening skills is difficult to achieve, it is imperative that faculty design instruction that fosters critical listening― (p. 34). Today, our teachers need to ask themselves whether or not they are consciously working to improve student listening skills, particularly critical listening skills? If not, they need to: (1) make a conscious decision to improve the listening skills of students, particularly their ability to listen to information critically; (2) plan to have the students regularly listen to text rather than read it in the during phase of the before, during, and after reading lesson plan format; (3) when possible, change comprehension strategies so the reading component is substituted by a listening component, and (4) take advantage of modern digital technologies, such as audio-assisted text, to practice critical listening and teach comprehension strategies. References Aron, H. (1992). Bookworms become tapeworms: A profile of listeners to books on audiocassette. Journal of Reading, 36(3), 208-212. Barbe, W.B., & Myers, R.M. (1954).