The China Investor Volume 1, Issue 2 | Page 45

generally subject to SEC registration, certain exemptions may apply, like VC fund advisors. Fund management may also be subject to broker/dealer registration under the SEA if it is involved in the business of brokering or dealing securities. Whether the management engages in broker dealer activities is a fact-sensitive question requiring thoughtful analysis. In practice, the most probative factor is whether the management receives “transaction- based” fees such as a percentage commission. This approach has been criticized by many lawyers and professionals as referring clients without being involved in the transaction does not appear to be broker/dealer activity. However, the SEC has taken the position that any activity which results in transaction-based fees being collected is presumed to be broker/dealer activity unless otherwise exempted. One typical mistake in the Chinese investment community is that “finders” are exempted from SEC registration. This has resulted in hefty fines in the EB-5 immigration industry where unregistered “finders” of immigrant investors found themselves being sued by the SEC. Moreover, both acting as a broker/dealer and using unregistered broker/dealer have legal ramifications. Fund management must carefully examine its marketing practices and fee structure to avoid violations of broker dealer rules. State-level registration must also be considered. For example, advisor with more than six New York clients are subject to registration or notice filing through New York’s Investment Adviser Registration Depository system even though the advisor may not need to register with the SEC. In the legal world, exceptions exist to general rules. When analyzing whether registration is required, we must carefully examine the facts against the statutory exemptions and industry practices so as not to run afoul of the fine prints. STRUCTURING A PRIVATE FUND While numerous funds are organized as limited partnership, it is not always the best option. Since different funds need to weather different risks and may be subject to different taxes, no structure, no matter how carefully designed, is universally applicable. Limited partnership generally works for funds in which the investors do not have much control over the investment. This is why most large investment funds are organized as limited partnership because the management does not want investors’ interference. In the U.S., a limited partnership, organized under the laws of a state, consists of a “general partner” and one or more “limited partners.” The limited partners are subject to limited liabilities. The general partner technically does not enjoy limited liability protection, but most general partners are organized as limited liability companies to limit the risk exposures of the natural persons operating the fund. The general partner has the ultimate authority to bind the partnership into any investment deals, but the fund’s Limited Partnership Agreement may limit the authority to a certain extent. Limited partnerships do not work where investors want to get actively involved in the investment. As stated, “fund” is WWW.THECHINAINVESTOR.COM 44