Study: Clear stance, clear direction | Page 6

06 | 02 PREFACE » Two roads diverged in a wood, and I – I took the one less traveled by, and that has « made all the difference. ROBERT L. FROST poet Many companies stress authenticity as an important element of their leadership models: they expect their managers to act authentically and to be honest and reliable. On an intuitive level, that appears to be right: if you can rely on your line manager because (s)he is honest, open and acts and communicates in a clear and sensible manner, you can work effectively because you have been given a clear framework and have no reason to fear unpleasant surprises. At the same time, in discussions of authenticity, this much-touted quality arouses a lot of cynicism. Many tend to smirk when someone claims to be acting genuinely or authentically. After all, managers are always urged to live up to their intended ROLE – otherwise they would not be good managers. According to a much-cited example – those who openly express their volatile temper or aggression in the company are far more likely to do damage than to benefit themselves and others. In view of this, the present study deals with the question of what authentic leadership actually is and whether it can contribute to “good leadership”. Proceeding from that, we answer the following questions: