St Oswald's Magazine StOM 1703 | Page 6

Although our historical knowledge of David is rather limited, his reputation certainly isn’t. It tells us of the boy in golden locks who defeats the giant Goliath, who comes across King Saul, his suspicious predecessor king, but does not kill him, who plays the lute and beguiles women, who is a great leader in battle but is not allowed to build the Temple because there is blood on his hands. In Jerusalem, today roads and buildings are named after him, the citadel of the city, although at most dating from 150 BC, is called ‘David’s palace’, David seems to be the embodiment of Israel, standing like ‘Zion’ for the hope of a people of ever living in peace in their own country, David stands for a nationalism which did not exist at the time of his life. If one were to reconstruct the life of David following the biblical accounts, it must have been around 1000 BC, that a young man from a leading family from the vicinity of Bethlehem went into the services of the Philistines. Based in the town of Ziglak, it was his task to defend the realm of the Philistines, which was a rather unstable administration consisting of some towns which had formed a confederation, against peoples south and southeast of the Negev. He had been successful and had gained riches and power. Success in another country did not lead him to forget his home country, and so he returned and by means of his money and power succeeded in unifying his tribe of Judea with the tribes of Israel in the North. Their capital had been the town of Nablus. The newly formed realm now needed a new capital, and he chose Jerusalem. Some translators of the Bible wrote that he conquered the city through deceit, some tell of a water pipe which led him into the centre of the city, but this is not confirmed. Maybe he didn’t have to conquer the city, it had been lived in by the ‘Jebusites’, a tribe not belonging to the tribes of Israel, yet he took over their ‘House of God’ and allowed their Priests to continue working there. However, he needed ‘a foundation myth’ for his new state, and this was provided by the tribe of Benjamin, which was in possession of the tabernacle since the flight from Egypt. In that way, David created a religious, social and political home for the Israelites. Jerusalem was not really suitable as a capital, it was situated next to the desert and had no significant trade, it also had a rather limited water supply. David’s palace must have been so small that despite intensive searches by archaeologists nothing of it was found as yet. But the foundation myth was so powerful that it is still working in our times. If Salomon was David’s son cannot be verified, but the successors of David found the unified kingdom too big to rule. The tribes in the North of Jerusalem, living in the wide and green valleys were politically more important than the Judeans, who lived next to the desert and were lacking in land. Their piety and reference to David always were an irritation to the Israelites. These northern tribes were successful producers of oil and were StOM Page 6