A Values-Centered Approach to AI
A Values-Centered Approach to AI
Are you a skeptic, a blind adopter, or somewhere in between?
As parents and educators, we are particularly concerned about and invested in how AI technology should or should not be used by our children. What does the“ right” use of AI entail- when, where, why, and how?
At Saint David’ s, we are approaching AI use in education through the same critical thinking, values-centered lens that guides all our decision making. How can we ensure that values such as integrity, honesty, hard work, and relational learning guide our approach to AI? Given that young minds are developing, how can AI be used wisely and appropriately so that the foundation of learning is preserved and critical thinking cultivated? A critical thinking approach requires not moving quickly in this space, but slowly, carefully, and with intention. Such intentionality aligns with our incorporation of technology across our academic program: its use is restricted to when it materially enhances and deepens learning while maintaining a safe environment, and is always developmentally appropriate.
In order to learn, boys must struggle. Learning and understanding result from grappling with difficult concepts and ideas, testing and retesting, and failing before achieving success. This process builds deep understanding and resilience in young learners. There is no easy short circuit, even though AI may appear to offer quick results. We also recognize the very strong social-emotional component to AI use. Children can develop emotional attachments with an AI device, relying on it for false self-validation.
For more than 15 years, Saint David’ s has worked extensively with Harvard’ s Project Zero’ s Making Thinking Visible, which focuses on the cultivation of critical thinking skills to deepen understanding in learners. In seeking an approach to AI consonant with our mission and values, we reached out again to Harvard and welcomed Dan Be Kim, AI Fellow, Harvard Graduate School of Education, to our campus to lead a series of information sessions for our administrators, faculty and staff, current parents, and incoming and prospective families. Ms. Kim’ s work explores how the right use of AI can truly enhance and augment- not replace- human intelligence.
In highly engaging researchbased talks, Ms. Kim laid out the“ good” and the“ bad” in AI. Discussing the“ skepticism to blind adoption” continuum that she introduced, she indicated that the critical approach lies in the middle, with“ thinking, introspection, and valuesalignment analysis.”
Many of us have heard of brain rot; Ms. Kim warned us of brain stunt: tech use in young children that can stunt their still-developing brains. While AI is often referred to as a tool, in practice it acts more like an assistant- doing the work for you, acting autonomously. The antidote to this is to preserve“ desirable difficulties”- the struggle in learning- and analog learning experiences.
“ In education,” Ms. Kim said,
62 • Saint David’ s Magazine