SAEVA Proceedings 2014 | Page 61

46TH  ANNUAL  CONGRESS  OF  THE  SAEVA        SKUKUZA      16-­‐20  FEBRUARY  2014   61     Group 2 using an unpaired t test. Significance was defined as P<0.05 and data are presented as mean °” s.e. All statistical analyses were conducted using GraphPad Prism Version 5.0 for Macg. Results The proportion of mares determined to be cycling, transitional or anoestrus was not different between Group 1 and Group 2 (P = 0.314), Group 1 and Group 3 (P = 0.11), or between Group 2 and Group 3 (P = 0.532) in mid November (Fig 2). At the end of the trial there was a difference in the proportion of mares exhibiting oestrous cyclicity between Group 1 and Group 3 (87.5% vs. 21%, respectively; P<0.0001) and also between Group 2 and Group 3 (80% vs. 21%, respectively; P<0.0003). There was no difference in oestrous cyclicity between Group 1 and Group 2 (87.5% vs. 80%, respectively; P = 0.335). Figure 3 illustrates the reproductive status of each group on 10 February. The number of mares determined to have ovulated was not different between Group 1 and Group 2, or between Group 1 and Group 3, on 20 January. However, a difference was observed between Group 2 and Group 3 (P = 0.014) indicating that more mares wearing light masks had ovulated than in the nonlight exposed control group at this time. On 6 February, there was no difference in number of mares that had ovulated between Group 1 and Group 2 but significant differences existed between Group 1 and Group 3 (P<0.001) and between Group 2 and Group 3 (P<0.001, Fig 4). Mean serum progesterone levels were significantly higher in mares classified as ‘cycling’ (n = 38) compared with ‘noncycling’ mares (n = 16) in samples collected after 1 January (P<0.0001). There was no significant difference in mean hair loss scores between Group 1 and Group 2 (3.06 °” 0.17 vs. 2.95 °” 0.195, respectively; P = 0.665), with moderate hair loss observed in both. Ophthalmic examinations prior to and after the study revealed no effect of treatment on eye health. Discussion Artificial advancement of the equine breeding season has become standard management practice for Thoroughbred breeders. This study shows that the reproductively active period of a nonpregnant mare can be advanced using low-level blue light to one eye fromhead-worn light masks and that this method is as effective as maintaining mares indoors under artificial lighting. While it was expected that a high proportion of mares in the barn-lit and light mask wearing groups would be cycling by the end of our study, what was surprising was the large proportion of mares from these groups that were still reproductively active at the beginning of the study in mid November. As reproductive examinations are not commonly carried out at this time of year, it is often assumed that mares enter winter anoestrus earlier in the year. However, we observed a transition to anoestrus that occurred between late December and early January in the mares that were still expressing cyclicity at the start of the study in our control group. Of interest is that a lower proportion of mares from Group 3, the control group, were still expressing oestrous cyclicity at this time. It is believed that the maintenance history of each of the experimental groups contributed to their reproductive status at the beginning of the study. Due to the size of the study, it was not possible to randomly allocate mares into 3 groups from a homogeneous population. The control   61