SAEVA Proceedings 2014 | Page 62

62   46TH  ANNUAL  CONGRESS  OF  THE  SAEVA        SKUKUZA      16-­‐20  FEBRUARY  2014     mares were maintained outdoors on a farm within an 8 km radius of the mares in the other experimental groups and had been living outdoors as a herd for several years prior to the study. Mares with constant exposure to the natural climatic challenges of the environment are known to exhibit a tighter breeding season and enter winter anoestrus, as is characteristic of feral mares [22]. While every effort was made to control for breed, body condition, age and nutritional intake, the management history of the animals in the experimental groups probably influenced their reproductive status in mid-November. At the end of the study, 4/19 of the control mares were reproductively cycl ing despite having received no stimulatory light signal. This finding of a subset of mares that continued to cycle throughout the year is supported by previous studies [23,24] and is a phenomenon unique to the equine species. Occasionally during the study incidents with the prototype masks, such as mud coating the reflective inner cup and masks breaking or falling off, meant that mares received either a lower intensity of light than intended or no light for a single night. This could have contributed to an inadequate light intensity failing to stimulate reproductive activity in the 3 mares from Group 2 that remained anoestrus at the end of the trial. It is believed that an optimised mask design may increase the success rate achieved. Our finding that low-level blue light from mobile light masks can successfully advance the breeding season in mares has implications for improving efficiency of equine breeding management. A recent survey of farm managers found that the cost of maintaining mares indoors under lights was approximately €120/mare/week (personal communication to B.A. Murphy). This figure was calculated based on combined feed, bedding, labour and energy costs. Assuming that artificial lighting programmes are initiated on 1 December and the earliest that a mare is covered is 15 February, the shortest duration a mare will be maintained under lights is until the first pregnancy check at Day 15 post covering. Thus the minimum duration of light therapy is 12 weeks (until 1 March). Our results suggest that the equine breeding season could now be advanced while the mares live outside in groups. This method is unlikely to reduce feed costs significantly, but bedding, labour and energy costs would be significantly reduced. In addition to the cost saving benefits, it has been reported that mares fed on fresh pasture ovulate earlier in the breeding season than mares fed on dry forage [25]. A previous investigation of the potential of delivering light to the mares eyes using white light-emitting blinkers as an alternative to stabling clearly showed the potential of this method [26]. The authors suggested that further technological advances were required before it became a viable option. The light mask described here represents the next step in the advancement of this technology towards a viable alternative for horse breeders, but with an important difference – the use of blue light delivered via LEDs to a single eye that has been shown to optimally inhibit melatonin levels necessary to provide the long-day photoperiod that stimulates the mare’s reproductive axis [19]. Horses are naturally herd animals and the social instinct for bonding with individuals is an important component of their socioecology [27]. Domestication by man has led   62