SA Roofing November 2018 // Issue 106 | Page 20

FEATURES Thatch industry under fire PART 2 In a follow up to SA Roofing’s September 2018 thatch feature, we further investigate the sector’s challenges and highlight the way forward through industry best practise. By Candace Sofianos King and Ntsako Khoza | Photos by Micon Coatings Designed by DK-Architects, The Lighthouse in Formby, England is constructed using a steel framed structure that is externally clad in a combination of contemporary brickwork and traditional thatching. O ne of the most nagging issues currently facing the thatching industry is the use of chemicals on thatch roofs – the requirements for fire retardant treatments or chemicals applied to thatch roofs are not monitored, resulting in a lack of control within the sector. This problem specifically relates to products and systems that have not been evaluated following the entire test protocol which will indicate the respective requirements with 18 NOVEMBER 2018 CLADDING // CONCRETE // INSULATION // STEEL // THATCH // TIMBER // TRANSLUCENT // WATERPROOFING // COMPONENTS regards to maintenance, re-application and effectiveness. These requirements should not only be displayed in product brochures but should also be part of the application contract with the client to ensure that the product and the effectiveness are correctly maintained. Once applied, the respective owner should also take responsibility should that be part of any other agreement, whether legislative or insurance related. Albeit that the negative perception exists in the market, and amongst several thatch roof experts, the reality of the situation is that there are many proven cases where fire retardant application has considerably reduced the amount of damage and loss to a thatched roof due to fire, says Mike Heatlie, Thatch Protection Services (TPS) engineer. He adds, “The application of such products has now been placed as a www.saroofing.co.za