Rising Soul Oct. 2013 | Page 6

Revisiting the dissed 56 of 1776 Every 4th of July collective generations of Americans gather together in their respective localities to oogle fireworks and slam hotdogs down their yappers in glorious celebration. It’s an annual day of joyous revelry and festive memory-making. The shame is that the underlying foundations for the holiday becomes more and more obscure over time, as modern gardeners of liberty allow weeds of neglect to overshadow the brilliance of our beginnings. The meaning behind the memories, both of 1776 and today’s celebrations, are now seldom, if ever, linked to the sanctity of the day’s original purpose or the principles and ideals that first made up its essence. It has become too easy in today’s day and age of cell phones, computers and instant information to look back on all past ages of history as being primitive and somehow lacking in depth or sophistication. But which age is really lacking? It is simple to see or evaluate another age from a viewing platform or perch that was only made so beautifully possible by the progression performed by predecessors. People of recent, self-anointed intellectual times lose sight of that while pretending to be visionaries. It is, for example, with startling increase, or in some quarters simply too much in vogue, easy to demonize the very founding fathers whose collective genius and sacrifice built the very first steps toward what are now considered to be universally accepted and embraced concepts of freedom and equality. Recognition, respect and appreciation have long been way overdue for the dissed 56 of 1776, those emboldened men who signed their names to parchment in sacred sacrifice, who changed the course of human history away from the dictates of kings, brutes and hereditary privilege toward an unchartered yet blessed pathway of individual liberty and rights. These 56 men from Great Britain’s 13 American colonies came together from various cultural, career, scholarly, financial and other arrays of demographic backgrounds, and with ultimate consensus set in motion a movement that continues today, based on the notion that all people should be left alone and afforded opportunity to strive for and attain dreams based on individual pursuits rather than being assigned their fate and needing permission to be free. We could use some politicians, and a few more citizens today, who understand this. 6