Reports Vendor Perception Study

2014 ETRM / CTRM Vendor Perception Study about 5% of the respondents. The responses associated with the various vendors are not necessarily reflective of the installed base of those vendors. In these results, Allegro would appear to be over-represented in terms of response rates within their client base, with others, such as OpenLink and Triple Point, being under-represented. Figure 6: Current System(s) in Use Allegro Excel In House SunGard None OpenLink Triple Point Generation 10 Brady DBC Smartsoft OATI Zainet SolArc Abacus Ventyx IRM Trayport Contigo ComFin Amphora PCI Calvus Solutions Ascend Analytics Lacima Siemens eOpt Vedaris Pricehub Navita VuePoint Utilisoft SAP 16% of the respondents indicated they were using Excel spreadsheets for some or all of their ETRM / CTRM requirements. A further 11% indicate that they are using some form of in-house developed system. 8% of the respondents, companies who may trade commodities as a non-core part of their wider businesses are not utilizing any type of dedicated ETRM/CTRM solution. 0% Asia-Pacific Commodity Technology Advisory llc 5% Europe 10% 15% Middle East 20% NAM © 2014 Commodity Technology Advisory, llc 25% SAM When asked how satisfied they were with their current solution(s), Figure 7, almost 90% of the respondents indicated some level of Figure 7: How satisfied are you with your satisfaction, with current solution? 19% saying they 1% 2% 9% were very satisfied, 50% satisfied and 19% 50% 19% somewhat satisfied. Only 9% 19% indicated they were dissatisfied with Satisfied Somewhat Satisfied Very Satisfied Dissatisfied their current No response Don't Know product(s). 8

Reports Vendor Perception Study | Page 8