Reports Vendor Perception Study

2014 ETRM / CTRM Vendor Perception Study Commodity Technology Advisory llc Figure 34 (compare with Figure 8 on page 9) shows the vendors that the consultants and integrators indicated that they knew, including geographic splits as well. In fact, the responses are almost Figure 33: Segment Relative Maturity Energy Commodities Overall Natural Gas Electric Power Figure 34: Known Vendors Consultants and Systems Integrators Only Crude Oil/Products Coal Overall Architecture Ags/Softs Shipping and Freight Grains Base Metals Delivered in the Cloud Ediable Oils Precious Metals Cotton/Coffee/Cocoa/Sugar Recyclables 0% Named Leader 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Un-named Leader As might be expected, the energy segments are indicated to be the most mature and metals and general ags and softs, along with recyclables appear to be the least mature. Focus on Consultants and Integrators Consultants and Integrators are often influential in selecting software and so their views are also interesting. In the previous results, the consultants and integrators are represented in most of the responses (unless otherwise stated), but what do the consultants and integrators responses tell us and how do they compare to the general responses? © 2014 Commodity Technology Advisory, llc OLF Allegro Triple Point SunGard Brady EKA Amphora Trayport Contigo Murex Enuit Abacus Quorum OATI Pioneer SAP Entero SolArc Aspect 0 5 NAM 10 Eur 15 20 25 Asia identical to the broader sample’s response with OpenLink and Allegro neck and neck as the most widely known vendors, and Triple Point and SunGard rounding out the top four. The next group is again Brady, EKA, Amphora, Trayport Contigo and Murex with just a slight change in order. 20

Reports Vendor Perception Study | Page 20