AFFECTATIONS PSYCHOSOCIAL BY CATEGORIES
The findings can be divided into four interrelated and interdependent categories, which allows a description of the main affected areas of the people. The following is more closely expressed:
1.
As explained by relatives, actions that were State agents after the murder of his family was present it as "low in combat" in the media, which caused two effects the stigmatisation and social exclusion; the first is that the family was designated as belonging to a certain illegal armed group, situation leading to new threats, and second family members were separated socially, either by social stigmatization or the fact violent, situation that caused their families, friends and loved ones is difference for fear that “something might happen”.
Therefore, not only had to deal with the news of losing one or more loved ones, but which should also withstand persecution, 90% of the interviewed relatives, reported receiving from constant citations to be accused as accomplices, follow-ups, threats and offers of money so not to denounce, among other things, with which, in many cases earned fear, since the violent fact took from them their social support networks and those institutional that relatives were not of trust. Added to this is that there was no a recognition on the part of the actors that contradict the information given in the first time or that if there was such recognition did not have the same media impact of the who sought at the time of reporting the fact in the first instance, so that the effects on the social level lasted even for years.
2.
As mention is made, the families were left unprotected, since 85% of the fatal victims were serving as a main economic livelihood, situation that created a deep crisis of income in all families increasing levels of poverty. In addition to this, it was evident the low possibility of getting a decent job that will help families to improve their economic situation, this is due to the stigma that was once created the fact occurred, all this aspect greatly hampered economic development of the family to the point that currently 92% of them are low-income, presented the unemployment as the biggest problem at present. This situation is reflected in Figure 5, in which there is evidence that 73.3% does not have all the utilities in your home, in the neighborhoods where they are located there is a high crime rate, accompanied by a high retail sale of substances psychoactive (SPA) and existence of brothels.
•
The victimizing facts affected and caused imbalances in the family dynamics, a situation that was marked by the loss of one or more loved ones in the same violent action. These effects were presented in different moments of his life, since cycle that the way in which were violations to human rights by agents of the State, followed by the harassment that she received, accompanied by threats and persecution that coupled with the constant negative acknowledge his crime, they prevented the family prepare the duel and adjust to the new needs.
The fact of assuming a new role in the family nucleus in a moment of crisis represents by itself a complex process and full of doubts, that by the circumstances deepened the impact on the family. All this prevented a collective space to process the pain that ended in turning into a baggage that they never open and they never leave it.
Families describe being in a sort of state of helplessness before her attacker, who also continues to maintain control of the situation. Indeed, 42% of households had family disintegration after victimization; As a result of the fear (they could be the following), the lack of economic resources, the social stigmatization and the failure to stand in the place where the facts occurred (their house, neighborhood or city).
8