REDNews January 2015 - Southeast Cover January 2015 | Page 29
REDNews
The last thing the world’s largest debtor,
the United States government, wants
is higher interest rates. That probably
means that a more realistic CPI will need
to be preceded by a return to fiscal
sanity in Washington—and really, what
are the chances of that?
enjoyment the consumer receives from changed
or improved features (as arbitrarily determined
by the BLS)
• ggressive use of seasonal adjustment factors—
A
for example, if gasoline prices usually go up in
the summer, they are reduced so that they do not
distort (in other words increase) the index
• se of a calculated rental value to reflect housing
U
costs for home owners
The effect of all these changes is to drastically
understate the rate of inflation. Why might that be?
• ocial Security payments are indexed to CPI.
S
Rather than actually address the costs and
burdens of a program that represents a huge
outflow of tax dollars, it is quietly debased.
•
Income tax brackets are raised every year to
reflect increases in CPI. Instead of actually
passing a tax increase every year to raise
more revenue, taxpayers are forced into higher
brackets as their nominal income increases
exceed the CPI adjustments.
• any federal employees have wage increases
M
tied to CPI. Each year they are forced to work
for lower real wages as their salaries fail to
keep pace with inflation.
The government has a huge financial
interest—increasing its revenue and
lowering its expenses—to lie about
inflation, but the chicanery runs deeper
than this. Think about the current state of the
economy: The BLS and other government
agencies report macroeconomic statistics in
currency, figuring in retail sales, industrial
production, durable goods orders, and
many other factors. Those numbers are
all adjusted to reflect real growth by
subtracting the rate of inflation. Real
retail sales for October 2014 reflected an
increase of 2.45 percent when adjusted
for the 1.7 percent annual inflation rate.
But what if the rate of inflation is 5.2 or
9.4 percent? In both cases real retail sales
contracted, in the latter case dramatically.
So, what is the real rate of
inflation?
There’s a statistical service that calculates
CPI in the fashion utilized both prior to the
Reagan Administration change and prior
to the Clinton Administration changes:
Shadow Government Statistics (www.
shadowstats.com). Its calculation for
October 2014, utilizing the pre-Reagan
methodology, is a 9.4 percent annual
inflation rate. The post-Reagan, pre-Clinton
calculation is a 5.2 percent annual rate.
So which inflation rate do we believe:
1.7 percent, 5.2 percent. or 9.4 percent?
Since the lowest rate is the product of a
system designed to underreport inflation, it
certainly can’t be correct. The other rates
are the product of professional statisticians
attempting to actually measure inflation
and as such are far more credible.
The officially reported CPI is a fraction of the real
rate of inflation, yet it permeates our economy.
Many private and nonfederal government
employees have their cost of living increases tied
to the official rate. Thus they are experiencing
a serious decline in their real incomes, which
becomes more acute with each passing year.
Pensioners and Social Security recipients are in
more dire straits, since they cannot alleviate the
problem by changing to a higher paying job or
negotiating a higher salary. It is likely that most
middle-income Americans are suffering through a
period of protracted decline in their standard of
living.
This is occurring against a backdrop of an economy
being promoted by both Washington and Wall
Street as prosperous and expanding. Those claims
don’t pass scrutiny if the numbers supporting them
are adjusted for an inflation rate that is in fact a
multiple of the officially reported rate.
Can the methodology be corrected?
The problem could be resolved by
Congressional action: Simply pass a
law requiring a return to the pre-1980
methodology. But that’s unlikely to
happen.
The United States government has run large fiscal
deficits for many years. Much of the debt to cover
these deficits has been acquired by the central
bank, the Federal Reserve Corporation, and the
purchases are paid for by creating new money.
It’s this increasing money supply that has been the
cause of persistent inflation.
Of course, there’s one other benefit we haven’t
yet mentioned the government receives by
reporting minimal inflation numbers, and that’s a
dampening of pressure to increase interest rates.
The last thing the world’s largest debtor, the United
States government, wants is higher interest rates.
That probably means that a more realistic CPI will
need to be preceded by a return to fiscal sanity
in Washington—and really, what are the chances
of that?
REDNews.com | 29