QU Book Local community directory /Letters | Page 5

Likewise there are 21,000 people who are earning over £60,000 a year and are receiving housing benefits, again this can’t be right. Cameron was going to have the bonfire of the quangos to save millions and all he did was close some of them down but the personnel were moved to other departments, how was that saving money? Now there is talk about secretaries of state being able to employ hundreds of experts earning up to £84,000, who will not have to be approved by the Civil Servant Commissioners, to work in private extended offices that could comprise more than 20 staff that already include civil servants, press officers, and special advisers. If junior ministers bring in their own teams, again this could be open to nepotism. The combined bill could be more than £20 million a year, this at a time when we are being told that departments are cutting their budgets. He has cut the army to the bone that is now making it probably impossible for them to carry out operation depending where they may occur in the world in the future. Britain’s influential position in NATO and the United Nations Security Council is being diminished. Continued on page 4 The scrapping of the Harrier jets and the Nimrod project that was coming to fruition was criminal scrapping them with no return to the tax payer, they could have been completed and sold at least the tax payer could have seen some return for their previous vast financial outlay. The fiasco over the BBC’s spending, top people were in many cases paid off with twice what they were legally entitled to we had excuses that the monies could not be recouped. But there were going to be draconian cuts to stop this occurring again and to save the licence fee payers money. They reduced senior managers but increased middle management numbers and salaries, how does this save money? Again who can we believe? The only way to save the licence fee payer is easy scrap the licence fee and let the BBC survive in the free market. This would also give the licence fee payers a saving of £145.50 a year for them to spend as they wished, and perhaps boost the economy. The BBC say that if the licence fee was scrapped it would damage their ability to make programmes well with some of what they are producing today this could only be a good thing.