qpr-1-2013-foreword.pdf | Page 62

62 Vebi Kosumi In 2005, the UN Secretary General appointed Marti Ahtisaari as a UN Special Envoy for the future status process of Kosovo (Ker-Lindsay 2009: 26 & 105). Ahtisaari organised direct negotiations between Kosovo and Serbia, recommending in March 2007 that Kosovo should become independent under the supervision of the international community (Babamusta 2008: 36). The United Nations Mission in Kosovo (UNMIK) administered Kosovo from 1999 until 17 February 2008, when Kosovo declared itself a Republic and an independent State (UNMIK 2013). Kosovo’s Conflict and Third Party Involvement The violent conflict between Kosovo Albanians and Serbs has had some periods of “negative peace”.1 During such periods, the conflict in Kosovo was ongoing but there was an absence of widespread violence and killing. This ended with the outbreak of war in the 1990s as the SFRY was disintegrating. The intervention of coercive third-party can bring such wars to an end (Cochrane 2008:55). There has been adequate political determination among the MPws to end the war in Kosovo and maintain the peace. NATO continues to keep the peace in Kosovo and this has been implemented through the UNMIK administration (19992008), and since then by the Kosovo Government and to a certain degree the European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo (EULEX). Ethnic tensions remain, but not large-scale violence, and certainly compared with the period before 1999 (or even ten years ago), the overall situation is calm. The struggles which continue are carried out through diplomatic relations. The nature of conflict between Serbia and Kosovo is based on different identity groups with different ethnicities, languages, beliefs and customs. Azar’s theory can apply to Kosovo’s conflict as he refers to 1 Galtung defines negative peace as the, “absence of organized collective violence” (1967: 17).