Pulse Day 3 Issue 4 | Page 2

INTERVIEW WITH JOHANNA BLAKLEY 10 am on a lazy Saturday morning. Lazy no more, for the exuberance of this charming personality was infectious, to say the least. The conference hall in VFAST had an air of picture perfect cleanliness. Perched on the edges of our seats, we stared apprehensively, wondering what would be. Across us sat Johanna Blakley, the one who had enraptured the BITSian audience with her Think Again talk. She had dissected the current marketing model, which classifies target audiences on the basis of demographics, and proved how it is incorrect. She greeted us with one of her warm smiles, and began one of the best discussions that I have had the opportunity of enjoying. The topic immediately went to some questions that were left unanswered in the lecture. When quizzed about the ideal replacement for the current marketing model, she brought to the fore the importance of big data analytics. Thanks to powerful computers and better data mining methodologies, the number crunching capacity is rising exponentially. Because of the internet, one often ends up leaving an extensive digital trail replete with vital information. Using this, each person can be evaluated subjectively according to his or her choices and preferences. Sadly, right now most of this data is being discarded and only the demographic details are being utilized. She claims that there is poor understanding of consumer psychology and social network at the executive level and this lack of understanding spawns a mistrust and fear of any new business model. There is a huge amount of inertia when it comes to such “risky” financial choices as they don’t want any sort of disruptions. And the people who can actually understand the implications of these new models are sadly unable to sell the idea to those at the executive levels. Marketers are not ready to move beyond their presumptions because they are making sufficient amount of profit at present. She maintains that such large scale data acquisition needs some legal framework so that the privacy and security rights are not violated. SOPA/PIPA which witnessed one of the biggest popular online movements, where people with different lifestyles came together. This according to her is indicative of the rising levels of awareness of consumers. She is critical of the media for the way it capitalizes on people’s weaknesses, be it the usage of extremely young models, the misrepresentation of products, or the usage of stereotypes to market products. However, the general population has started recognizing the stereotypical nature of most advertisements and this results in the occasional backlash too. When asked about the relationship between propaganda and media, she gives the example of American involvement in World War 2. USA, which was officially a neutral state, would not allow film makers to direct movies depicting any country or leader in bad light. As a result, public opinion was against entering the war. But when Pearl Harbour was bombed, the USA government began encouraging such movies, resulting in massive amount of content generation. The entire country was buoyed into the war. “So yeah, we do need to be really careful,” she says. As the day wore on, the topic of discussion shifted to intellectual p roperty rights. She maintains that although designers may initially lose significant amount of money to plagiarists, it gives them an incentive to evolve faster and think of new and better things. For example, in the fashion industry, plagiarism helps to create a trend and establishes the designer as a person who can anticipate the desires of people, and whose aesthetic senses are appreciated by people. This ends up giving a boost to his reputation. With a PhD in English, her journey began as an employee in the video game design firm Vivendi. Having worked on programmes as varied as Teletubbies to interactive and educational entertainment games, she had a brief stint in business law, following which she shifted over to social sciences. With research areas covering a wide range of issues, from social interactions to cultural diplomacy to celebrity While she does say that we need to be wary of the ability of politics, she feels interactive media will be the harbingers of large media houses to manipulate legislation by lobbying the next big revolution. And that is what drives her to go using their vast resources, she also quotes the example of on.