Publications from ODSW Social Work Supervsion | Page 58

Workshop 3: PPIS Coordinated Multi-Pronged Supervision Programme: Towards An Evidence Based Approach’ individual or group supervision. She opined that it was beneficial to have the professional counselling managed by the same department. Processes Paradigm In terms of the paradigm that PPIS has adopted to guide their supervision, Ms Mosli stated that the first was ‘social work knowledge’. This refers to being mindful that social workers are professionals trained in the discipline of social work and to treat them as such. The second was to be mindful of adult learning styles and to work with the supervisees according to these learning styles. The third was to acknowledge the agency specialized knowledge that social workers have and the fourth was to utilize positioning theory in supervision. The fifth was to be aware of the systems in place and the sixth was to make use of Asian values during supervision. Ms Mosli expressed that while they have been very careful to keep the Malay culture and Islamic values in mind, they could have been more mindful of the culture and values of other races. The last paradigm would be included as part of ones reflexive in practice. Reflexive practice Ms Mosli expressed that reflexive practice is what guards the processes in social work. She expressed that the essence of reflexive practice is about observing one’s own practice and recalibrating one’s own actions in relation to others (John Burnham, 1993). Reflexivity in practice is not about the details or the basics of the case but about the person of the worker and about questioning oneself and others. It relates to how one sees the world and there is a need to inculcate the process in the delivery. In so doing, the worker will become more aware of what has to happen for them and what has to happen for the client. Issues shared by the client can often trigger the worker’s own issues and struggles. It could affect their idea of what a social worker is, and if not managed well, could lead to burn out. Reflexive practice can help the worker to process this, and help them to understand why they are feeling what they are feeling and the corresponding reaction they have towards their client. Ms Mosli then proceeded to differentiate reflectiveness from reflexiveness. Reflectiveness is about applying pre-established theories and models without question and coming to a common understanding of a pre-established view. Reflexiveness is concerned with questioning theories, practice and policies that have been taken for granted and accepting that there are different perspectives to approaching an issue. Ms Mosli expressed that while reflectiveness is paramount and the first step, we ought to seek to move workers from reflectiveness to reflexiveness. 3 groups of supervision Supervisees can be broadly categorized into 3 categories. The first is the novice group. The aim of the supervisor in this group is to help them to develop their third eye, to enable them to evaluate how they are doing what they are doing. The focus of this group is to reflect on their actions. The second group is the intermediate group. The aim of the supervisor in this group is to help them develop relational reflexivity and to use what they have observed about themselves and their practice in relation to their client. This helps them to identify how what they do affects the client and vice versa. The focus of this group is on processes. 56