Publications from ODSW Social Insights: Letters by DSW (Vol 2) | Page 145

Special Editions
Singapore’s strategy for social development centred among other things
on the establishment of a legitimate authority and the creation of a national
identity to attain social integration. This embodied the need for an effective
and efficient government, and the creation of new “national” values.
Specifically, nation building embodied material and utilitarian concerns of
administration and resource control, and the development of a collective
identity (and values) that would enable individuals to associate with the state.
Singapore’s first priority focus was on the ability to protect and develop one’s
resources and then grow economically to progress as a nation. While these
aspects of economic development are important, they are insufficient to
engender social development. Military and economic capability to defend
one’s country and a closely knit society are also instrumental in making a
nation viable.
Singapore, while emphasizing economic priorities in the early days of nation
building nursed very nascent but important efforts to safeguard the interests
of some vulnerable groups in society through protection in legislation
and support services and support systems. These include crèches, public
assistance and welfare schemes that support families as the adults worked in
the newly formed industries. These could be seen in the areas of protection
of children, women and girls since the early days, the care of children and
those who are disadvantaged, and the rehabilitation of those who are
involved in social ills or have committed offences.

Singapore’s Social Safety Net
Any discussion on social development and social integration in Singapore
will not be complete without understanding what is offered in the social
safety net as the model of human service provisions. The model is one
that nurtures the strengths in individuals, families and communities to
safeguard their well-being by raising their resources and enhancing their
self-determination to realise their potential.
In recent years, many governments had to confront the dual challenges of an
ageing population and rising expectations from their citizens. Globalisation
has also added complexities to these challenges, with some blaming free
trade and open markets for widening income inequality and causing median
wage stagnation. Amidst this global context, Singapore continues to adhere
to and implement a policy of social inclusion that is driven by supported
self-reliance. Self-reliance and a work ethic are virtues that are deemed to
benefit both the individual and the society. Having access to good jobs and
opportunities to apply one’s talent and skills at work contribute to social
144