Publications from ODSW Social Insights: Letters by DSW (Vol 2) | Page 139

Special Editions in the community, often in ways that produced benefits that surpassed the financial formula. The many helping hands include the state that set the legal, regulatory and financial parameters, the VWOs that directly serve the social needs of communities, and the boards and organisations that take care of governance, volunteers, staff, donors and funders. The focus is in coordinating the different parties who intend to help in a way that ensures adequate and timely delivery of services to those in need. The human arm may be used as an analogy to explain the important roles played by the state and the various key stakeholders. The upper part of the arm represents the donors and the funders, including the state. They are the muscles that build and help to strengthen the limb work. The hand and fingers represent the social agencies and volunteers. They are the ones who are directly in touch with the target. Being on the ground, they are able to respond more nimbly, with immediacy, empathy and compassion. Every part of the arm, including the limb and muscles, are intertwined, with each supported by the other in order to be responsive and effective. They may have similar goals but each of them can be distinctive and yet complementary. The state is part of the muscles, but it is also the palm that connects the arm and the fingers. It connects and channels resources from the upper arm to the different fingers. The state also plays the role of enabler by supporting ground initiatives that enhance community participation and facilitate connections between the givers and the recipients of help. In addition to ensuring adequate financing for the social se ctor, the state also invests in manpower development including initiatives with a long-term view such as mid-career re-training, sabbatical leave schemes, scholarships and various professional and organisational leadership schemes. Challenges in balancing tensions Policy tensions are healthy when they are examined and debated because the end result is likely a deeper understanding of the issues which will in turn help produce effective solutions. In recent years, two significant policy tensions related to social services have surfaced. The first concerns the roles of the state and family in the “heavy-lifting” care of family members. This is sometimes presented as the tension for greater intervention from government on one hand and the preservation of the role of the family and community. The second tension is that of centralised integrated support that tends to provide more efficient service delivery versus a less organised and uneven system that tends to involve a wider community participation. 138