Philosophically Speaking: Annals of the International Philosophy Grou Philosophical-Annals-I-2016 | Page 53

Derrida, Kabbalah, Talmud and the Post-Modernism Politics
It’s not just the force of power become the law, but the law become legitimize, 144 and the law
become unjust and arbitrary. 145 Derrida interpreted Montaigne the obedience to the law is due
because the authority—power or authority come from the force. 146 For Derrida the
rationalization for the authority manifest as product not only force, but the force itself become
the economics, 147 and the implementation become political, using the force of the law to
achieve economic and control—politics. 148
While, some will define politics is the art of compromise, Derrida point to the fact, the if
Justices exist most be outside itself, 149 therefore cannot be deconstruct, but deconstruction
itself is justice, because justice can be constructed, since can go behind the opposites and the
instrument for the deconstruction is the argument of his legality.
For Derrida deconstruction is internal ambiguity, which opens the possibility to question,
where politics requires an action, but in the realm of question, every action becomes a
question. For politics to achieve nee an action, finality, this finality is the force, the mystical
power which give legitimize the law.
The law is the action of the politics, the fundamental problem, which is making the decision
what is compromise is the issue in question for Derrida. 150 For Derrida the acts of
compromise for the individual appeal to Kant conformity. 151 In other words, the tool which
politics—elite used to subjugate is by the routine and the routine is conformity, since the rule
is an invention, but of course some rules are social conventions we used for each other to
main some social equilibrium, I should not kill, because what I can do, someone else can do
to the other—me.
144
Ibid., 925
Ibid., 929
146
Ibid., 939
147
Ibid., 941
148
Ibid., 943
149
Ibid., 945
150
Ibid., 947
151
Ibid., 949
145
53