Peace & Stability Journal Volume 2, Issue 4 | Page 7

Peace & Stability Operations Journal Online Strategic Considerations Relating to DDR by Mr. Raymond Millen At first blush, DDR—viz., Disarmament, Demobilization, and Reintegration of former warring factions into society—is rather straightforward, with degrees of success predicated on the amount of resources and time dedicated to its fulfillment. As a matter of practice, DDR often serves as the tactical component of Security Sector Reform (SSR), which serves as the overarching framework, focusing on the political-security reform strategy for a designated nation-state. By military analogy, DDR is the beachhead and SSR is the subsequent land campaign. This subordinating relationship can potentially result in little or no strategic analysis necessary to formulating a DDR strategy. Implementing a DDR program is so complex, laborious, resource dependent, and time consuming, that it demands a thorough understanding of the strategic implications. Realistically, if donor nations and organizations are truly interested in assisting a post-war state, the effort requires a long-term DDR commitment. Generally, there are two instances in which DDR is appropriate: at the request of an existing government involved in an extended insurgency; and in the aftermath of a conflict, resulting in regime change, wherein the new government seeks a fresh start through DDR. In both cases, a peace agreement among the former warring factions is an essential first step. The least desirable course is to implement a partial or unilateral DDR if a peace agreement is not implemented. Under these circumstances, peacekeeping or coalition troops would need to shoulder the security burden until the host nation security forces are ready to assume the burden. More problematic, the host nation is not impelled to provide security for the populace, which is a core function of the state, so legitimacy comes into question. One should underscore that engaging in DDR activities signifies an intervention in a state’s internal affairs, which can create foreign policy dilemmas for the intervening powers: an entanglement in the domestic affairs of the host nation; a commitment to the survival of the regime; and a cultivation of host nation dependency on donor nations/organizations to the point of inhibiting its evolution as a democracy. Because of the aforementioned implications of DDR, intervention is a high policy decision, implying the national deliberative body (i.e., the national security council or cabinet) should view GHŌR, Afghanistan (May 28, 2012) – Former Taliban fighters line up to handover their Rifles to the Government of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan during a reintegration ceremony at the provincial governor’s compound. The re-integrees formally announced their agreement to join the Afghanistan Peace and Reintegration Program during the ceremony. (Department of Defense photograph by Lt. j. g. Joe Painter/RELEASED) DDR through a strategic lens. First, it must determine that the conditions are right for a DDR program to begin. Second, it must take structural reform of the host nation political system seriously rather than as a formality. Third, it must consider carefully the size, composition, and distribution of security forces necessary for a democracy to prosper. These strategic considerations represent the golden triangle of DDR, and if they are achieved, they will provide the host nation with a solid foundation for growth. Determining the Prerequisites for Initiating DDR As the national deliberative body considers the decision to initiate a DDR program, it must not become hostage to events or motivated by utopianism; instead discussion should focus on the strategic effects it seeks to attain. As strategic theorist Colin S. Gray instructs, strategy is the exercise of power in pursuit of political goals, and its purpose is to change the behavior of another political actor in ways the protect or promote national interests. The sum total of activities that support a strategy achieves a strategic effect, which is “the currency that produces pksoi.army.mil 5