Peace & Stability Journal Peace & Stability Journal Volume 6, Issue 2 | Page 21

The leveraging of doctrine to design a planning process that produced a clear, understandable country plan for Army South’s critical partner countries fell to the G3 plans branch.5 The collective minds of trained planners, strategists, and operations research/systems analysts were used to design the process that would focus the security cooperation activity. Army South leaders required the planning process to include four imperatives; the process must 1) fit into the operational battle rhythm of the Army South headquarters, 2) be led by G3 plans branch and involve all directorates and eliminate stove pipes, 3) yield engagements that target host nation military requirements, and 4) produce clear products for the commander to make decisions. The design team worked through a concept approval process to design and implement a modified security cooperation operational planning process that focused on country specific security cooperation planning within the headquarters, entitled the Theater Security Cooperation Planning Process, or TSCP2. TSCP2 is the art and science of understanding the situation for command emphasized countries in the region, and describes the desired future of their landpower forces. TSCP2 lays out effective ways of engaging partner nation to build capabilities or increase capacities. As currently designed, one iteration of TSCP2 for a single partner nation is a 16-day process conducted across four to five calendar weeks. Shown in Figure 1, it consists of five primary parts that align as closely as possible with the JOPP: 1) Country Immersion Workshop (Mission Analysis), 2) Objective Refinement Working Group (COA Development, Analysis, Comparison, and Approval), 3) Objective Assessment Development Working Group, 4) Node-Action-Resource Development, and 5) Synchronization Workshop, which lead to the development of a country plan. Through these steps, the process is intended to achieve five objectives: 1) develop, and on subsequent process cycles, validate a common understanding of the current operating environment, 2) develop/validate the Army South’s objectives and effects for a country, 3) develop/validate the metrics for measuring progress towards the effects, 4) develop/confirm Nodes-Actions-Resources, and 5) publication of an updated Country Plan. See Figure 1 below. 19