Peace & Stability Journal Peace & Stability Journal Volume 6, Issue 2 | Page 19

Introduction Have you worked in a unit or organization that seemed very short sighted? Where it felt like the command was only focused on the here and now, never looking more than a week out. You recall thinking that a majority of the members of the organization only worked on the current operation. As an analogy, it was as if the unit functioned like a youth soccer team and everyone’s myopic focus was the ball directly in front of them as they collectively moved like a swarm of little bees. What is needed, you thought, was to widen the command’s perspective, to look deeper into the future, the way an advanced soccer team covers the whole field. As such, the team that learns to work together and anticipates achieves more victories. Organizational change is difficult, as demonstrated through the thousands of books available on the subject. This article is not intended to offer more solutions to this complex challenge, but it will show how one operational level command, United States Army South, has taken steps to evolve, beyond its tendency to swarm.1 This article explains how the command’s leaders began to evaluate their security cooperation planning processes and products by asking a few key questions such as: What are the activities we are conducting?; What are the objectives of our security cooperation plan?; How do we know our objectives are correct?; What is our progress towards achieving our objectives? The answers to these questions were deemed unsatisfactory. As a result, senior leaders reallocated finite resources, and empowered the staff to make genuine changes to the security cooperation planning process. This article will show how empowering subordinate leaders