ON Chiropractic Spring 2014 | Page 21

ON Chiropractic a component of muscle building and will ultimately lead to restructuring, greater strength and function,” said Dr. Takes. Charting the Best Course with a Patient D r. Takes is the first to admit that finding the right sequence of therapies for each patient can be challenging. The place to start is with an open dialogue with the patient. Identification of the patient’s goals is step one. Then you will be able to develop a treatment plan that gets at the root cause of the patient’s symptoms and dysfunction. When you identify that an exercise therapy component can help a patient achieve their goals, the process of building an exercise program begins. The foundation for that building process is likely to be the three bedrocks of exercises focussing on lengthening, stabilizing and strengthening tissues. There is no tried and true approach, though, and it does take practice to develop a clear sense of how individual patients may respond to exercise therapies. Dr. Takes believes that working with patients in the early stages of their exercise programs is essential. “Supervised exercise is always going to trump unsupervised exercise,” he believes. This is especially true when working through the early stages of recovery from a dysfunction or injury. Given that a loss of proprioception often accompanies or contributes to dysfunction it is very challenging for patients to perform exercises correctly, with proper alignment and posture, when they are not being supervised by a trained health care provider. Dr. Takes explains with an example: “Patients can’t always see what we see. That their traps are firing too much and their shoulder blades are elevating as they retract, putting pressure on the cervical spine.” After demonstrating a proficiency in completing a certain subset of supervised exercise, the patient can then self-supervise. But until it is clear that the patient will not exacerbate their symptoms, supervision should remain in place whenever possible. “The last thing we want is for a patient to waste six weeks in a self-supervised exercise program by working the wrong muscles and potentially making matters worse.” This is supported in research literature as well. The Spine Journal published the results of a clinical study in 2011 that examined the relative impact of supervised trunk exercises, chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy and home exercises on patients with mechanical low back pain. The study found that all of the interventions yielded similar results, but that those who received supervised trunk exercise were the most satisfied with care and experienced the greatest gains.D Spine published an article in 2012 with similarly telling results. This study, conducted at the Wolfe-Harris Center for Clinical Studies at Northwestern Health Sciences University, compared the benefits of high dose supervised strengthening exercise with spinal manipulative therapy, high dose strengthening exercise alone and home exercise combined with patient education for the treatment of chronic neck pain. Supervised strengthening exercise with and without spinal manipulation outperformed home exercise.w These studies reinforce what Dr. Takes believes, that the combination of patient education, manual therapy and supervised exercise therapy can be of tremendous benefit to patients. “Exercise therapy has to be one of the tool ́ݔ