Observing Memories Issue 3 | Page 78

site of the Lenin cult’ and was quickly associated «All the questions on the subject of being or of what is to be (or not to be) are questions of inheritance… That we are heirs does not mean that we have or that we receive this or that, some inheritance that enriches us one day with this or that, but that the being of what we are is first of all inheritance, whether we like it or know it or not» (Ibid: 54). with sovereignty (Tumarkin 1997: 267). Nikita Khrushchev’s decision to return to the purity of Lenin during the period of de-Stalinization conjured up Lenin’s spirit against Stalinist excess. Stalin had deviated from the foundational doctrine of Leninism and the spirit of revolution. Lenin was higher than Stalin; hence his physical presence suggested the continuity of state sovereignty and the Communist Party, regardless of changes in the political leadership. As a place of memory, the tribune on Lenin’s Mausoleum was the most important place where party leaders gathered on revolutionary holidays to commemorate the October Revolution and the Great Patriotic War. The Mausoleum was the iconic site for viewing parades, especially those held on Victory Day so that the spectral presence of Lenin accompanied Soviet leaders as they stood over his preserved sovereign body. As Alexei Yurchak argues, Lenin «literally transcended every individual body of party members, leaders, and even Lenin himself; it was, in fact, the immortal body of the sovereign» (2015: 147). Of particular importance is Derrida’s argument that living in the present means living with the Scientists at the Mausoleum Lab (Centre inheritance of the past. Since we are heirs to the for Scientific Research and Teaching Methods in past, the way in which the past is received is very Biochemical Technologies) preserve the physical much open to interpretation. We do not choose remains of Lenin’s body. While only his face, when we are born. Our sense of self is first of all hands and dark suit are visible to the viewer, the inheritance. Traditionally, an open coffin is the last Mausoleum group maintains the flexibility and life- instance when mourners bid farewell before burial or like quality of Lenin’s body. Once every eighteen cremation. However, visitors to Lenin’s Mausoleum months, his body undergoes lengthy re-embalming have been in a state of warped mourning for over procedures lasting for up to two months -with ninety years. Instead of burial, his artificially treatments include attention to joints, hair and the preserved body has become a life-like hybrid skeletal system. Throughout the decades, doctors monument, a pure sign and symbol. have developed new techniques for preserving his body, requiring regular re-embalming, baths and the Political theology of the Soviet and post-Soviet state substitution of organic material with artificial ones (Yurchak 2015). While the modern secular state continues to Immediately after his death, Lenin’s sanctify relics with the internment of remains in Mausoleum functioned as a kind of ‘pilgrimage 76 Observing Memories ISSUE 3 tombs of the unknown soldier, the cult of veneration